Literature DB >> 12829243

Integration and cross-validation of high-throughput gene expression data: comparing heterogeneous data sets.

Vincent Detours1, Jacques E Dumont, Hugues Bersini, Carine Maenhaut.   

Abstract

Data analysis--not data production--is becoming the bottleneck in gene expression research. Data integration is necessary to cope with an ever increasing amount of data, to cross-validate noisy data sets, and to gain broad interdisciplinary views of large biological data sets. New Internet resources may help researchers to combine data sets across different gene expression platforms. However, noise and disparities in experimental protocols strongly limit data integration. A detailed review of four selected studies reveals how some of these limitations may be circumvented and illustrates what can be achieved through data integration.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12829243     DOI: 10.1016/s0014-5793(03)00522-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEBS Lett        ISSN: 0014-5793            Impact factor:   4.124


  14 in total

1.  Coexpression analysis of human genes across many microarray data sets.

Authors:  Homin K Lee; Amy K Hsu; Jon Sajdak; Jie Qin; Paul Pavlidis
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  An attempt for combining microarray data sets by adjusting gene expressions.

Authors:  Ki-Yeol Kim; Se Hyun Kim; Dong Hyuk Ki; Jaeheon Jeong; Ha Jin Jeong; Hei-Cheul Jeung; Hyun Cheol Chung; Sun Young Rha
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 4.679

3.  Meta-analysis of muscle transcriptome data using the MADMuscle database reveals biologically relevant gene patterns.

Authors:  Daniel Baron; Emeric Dubois; Audrey Bihouée; Raluca Teusan; Marja Steenman; Philippe Jourdon; Armelle Magot; Yann Péréon; Reiner Veitia; Frédérique Savagner; Gérard Ramstein; Rémi Houlgatte
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Breast cancer molecular signatures as determined by SAGE: correlation with lymph node status.

Authors:  Martín C Abba; Hongxia Sun; Kathleen A Hawkins; Jeffrey A Drake; Yuhui Hu; Maria I Nunez; Sally Gaddis; Tao Shi; Steve Horvath; Aysegul Sahin; C Marcelo Aldaz
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.852

5.  Design, development, and evaluation of the Maternal Outcomes and Nutrition Tool (MONT).

Authors:  Janelle M McAlpine; Anthony V Perkins; Jessica J Vanderlelie
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Translation research: from accurate diagnosis to appropriate treatment.

Authors:  Craig P Webb; Harvey I Pass
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2004-10-21       Impact factor: 5.531

7.  Absence of a specific radiation signature in post-Chernobyl thyroid cancers.

Authors:  V Detours; S Wattel; D Venet; N Hutsebaut; T Bogdanova; M D Tronko; J E Dumont; B Franc; G Thomas; C Maenhaut
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-04-25       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  InSilico DB genomic datasets hub: an efficient starting point for analyzing genome-wide studies in GenePattern, Integrative Genomics Viewer, and R/Bioconductor.

Authors:  Alain Coletta; Colin Molter; Robin Duqué; David Steenhoff; Jonatan Taminau; Virginie de Schaetzen; Stijn Meganck; Cosmin Lazar; David Venet; Vincent Detours; Ann Nowé; Hugues Bersini; David Y Weiss Solís
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2012-11-18       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  Three methods for optimization of cross-laboratory and cross-platform microarray expression data.

Authors:  Phillip Stafford; Marcel Brun
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Novel and simple transformation algorithm for combining microarray data sets.

Authors:  Ki-Yeol Kim; Dong Hyuk Ki; Ha Jin Jeong; Hei-Cheul Jeung; Hyun Cheol Chung; Sun Young Rha
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-06-25       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.