BACKGROUND: There is limited information about respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in high-risk children from developing countries or on the genotype characterisation of the circulating virus. OBJECTIVE: To define the proportion of children with RSV associated lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) that had risk factors for severe disease and to genotype the circulating RSV strains across the country. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective study was performed in four distinct regions. During April 2000-December 2000 (period 1), all children, with LRTI or without underlying high risk factors for severe RSV disease were enrolled. During January to September 2001 (period 2), only children with LRTI with underlying high risk factors were enrolled. Nasopharyngeal aspirates were evaluated for RSV infection using an ELISA test. RSV isolates were also subtyped and genotyped. RESULTS: Fifty three (24%) of 220 children enrolled during period 1 had risk factors for severe RSV disease; in addition to which a further 38 high-risk children were enrolled during 2001. RSV was isolated from 16 (30%) of 53 and 37 (22%) of 167 high-risk and non-high risk children, respectively, P=0.31. High-risk children were more likely to require intensive unit care (25 vs. 2.7%, P=0.02) and were also more likely to be hospitalised for a longer duration (median 7 vs. 5 days, P=0.06) than non high-risk infants. Overall (periods 1 and 2), RSV was isolated from 34 (37.4%) of the 91 high-risk infants enrolled. Among high-risk children, those from whom RSV was isolated were more likely to require hospitalisation (73.5 vs. 54.4%, P=0.07) and admission to an intensive care unit (14.7 vs. 1.8%, P=0.03) than those from whom RSV was not isolated. Of 40 isolates subtyped during period one, 92.5% were subtype A. Further, 27 (83.3%) of 30 subtype A isolates genotyped during period 1 clustered with GA2. CONCLUSION: RSV is an important cause of LRTI among high-risk infants in a developing country such as South Africa. For the season in question, the genotype that was dominant in Johannesburg was isolated throughout the country, suggesting that successful genotypes may have the ability to spread nationwide.
BACKGROUND: There is limited information about respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in high-risk children from developing countries or on the genotype characterisation of the circulating virus. OBJECTIVE: To define the proportion of children with RSV associated lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) that had risk factors for severe disease and to genotype the circulating RSV strains across the country. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective study was performed in four distinct regions. During April 2000-December 2000 (period 1), all children, with LRTI or without underlying high risk factors for severe RSV disease were enrolled. During January to September 2001 (period 2), only children with LRTI with underlying high risk factors were enrolled. Nasopharyngeal aspirates were evaluated for RSV infection using an ELISA test. RSV isolates were also subtyped and genotyped. RESULTS: Fifty three (24%) of 220 children enrolled during period 1 had risk factors for severe RSV disease; in addition to which a further 38 high-risk children were enrolled during 2001. RSV was isolated from 16 (30%) of 53 and 37 (22%) of 167 high-risk and non-high risk children, respectively, P=0.31. High-risk children were more likely to require intensive unit care (25 vs. 2.7%, P=0.02) and were also more likely to be hospitalised for a longer duration (median 7 vs. 5 days, P=0.06) than non high-risk infants. Overall (periods 1 and 2), RSV was isolated from 34 (37.4%) of the 91 high-risk infants enrolled. Among high-risk children, those from whom RSV was isolated were more likely to require hospitalisation (73.5 vs. 54.4%, P=0.07) and admission to an intensive care unit (14.7 vs. 1.8%, P=0.03) than those from whom RSV was not isolated. Of 40 isolates subtyped during period one, 92.5% were subtype A. Further, 27 (83.3%) of 30 subtype A isolates genotyped during period 1 clustered with GA2. CONCLUSION:RSV is an important cause of LRTI among high-risk infants in a developing country such as South Africa. For the season in question, the genotype that was dominant in Johannesburg was isolated throughout the country, suggesting that successful genotypes may have the ability to spread nationwide.
Authors: Monica C Galiano; Concepcion Palomo; Cristina M Videla; Juan Arbiza; José A Melero; Guadalupe Carballal Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Kate L Stokes; Michael H Chi; Kaori Sakamoto; Dawn C Newcomb; Michael G Currier; Matthew M Huckabee; Sujin Lee; Kasia Goleniewska; Carla Pretto; John V Williams; Anne Hotard; Taylor P Sherrill; R Stokes Peebles; Martin L Moore Journal: J Virol Date: 2011-04-06 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: N Homaira; J-L Oei; K-A Mallitt; M E Abdel-Latif; L Hilder; B Bajuk; K Lui; M Ferson; A Nurkic; G M Chambers; W Rawlinson; T Snelling; A Jaffe Journal: Epidemiol Infect Date: 2015-12-02 Impact factor: 4.434
Authors: Viviane F Botosso; Paolo M de A Zanotto; Mirthes Ueda; Eurico Arruda; Alfredo E Gilio; Sandra E Vieira; Klaus E Stewien; Teresa C T Peret; Leda F Jamal; Maria I de M C Pardini; João R R Pinho; Eduardo Massad; Osvaldo A Sant'anna; Eddie C Holmes; Edison L Durigon Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2009-01-02 Impact factor: 6.823