Literature DB >> 12828437

Comparative evaluation of a new removable Jasper Jumper functional appliance vs an activator-headgear combination.

Zafer Sari1, Yasar Goyenc, Cenk Doruk, Serdar Usumez.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to comparatively evaluate the effects of an activator-headgear (HG) combination to a Jasper Jumper (JJ) plus occipital HG, which was incorporated into removable upper and lower plates. The study group consisted of 60 subjects with mandibular deficiency and a vertical growth pattern. Of these, 20 were treated with JJ appliance-HG incorporated to removable upper and lower plates, 20 were treated with an activator-HG combination. Another 20 subjects who refused orthodontic treatment served as controls. Pre- and postreatment lateral cephalograms and hand-wrist films were gathered for all 60 subjects. Lateral cephalograms were manually traced before being transferred to RMO JOE software by a digitizer. Measurements that are not included in the software were measured manually. Thirty-five dental and skeletal parameters were used in the study. The collected data were subjected to statistical analysis using SPSS packet software. Wilcoxon paired t-test was used for intragroup comparisons. Differences between groups were evaluated by analysis of variance and Bonferroni tests. Results suggest that ANB angle was decreased significantly in both treatment groups compared with the controls. Increase in total facial height was greater in the activator group than in the JJ group. Vertical growth inhibition of lower incisors was greater in the JJ group. The activator-HG appliance was more effective on the mandible, whereas the JJ appliance was mainly active on the maxilla. Thus, ideal cases for JJ-splinted appliance should be high-angle cases, particularly with maxillary excess and some mandibular deficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12828437     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0286:CEOANR>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  3 in total

Review 1.  Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Klaus Bsl Batista; Badri Thiruvenkatachari; Jayne E Harrison; Kevin D O'Brien
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-03-13

2.  Treatment effects of R-appliance and anterior inclined bite plate in class II, division I malocclusion.

Authors:  Rahman Showkatbakhsh; Shahin Emami Meybodi; Abdolreza Jamilian; Seyyed Amir Reza Fatahi Meybodi; Elham Morshedi Meybodi
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.698

3.  Treatment effects of the Jasper Jumper and the Bionator associated with fixed appliances.

Authors:  Leniana Santos Neves; Guilherme Janson; Rodrigo Hermont Cançado; Karina Jerônimo Rodrigues Santiago de Lima; Thaís Maria Freire Fernandes; José Fernando Castanha Henriques
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 2.750

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.