Literature DB >> 12827562

Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score does not predict patient or graft survival in living donor liver transplant recipients.

Paul H Hayashi1, Lisa Forman, Tracy Steinberg, Thomas Bak, Michael Wachs, Marcelo Kugelmas, Gregory T Everson, Igal Kam, James F Trotter.   

Abstract

Although living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is a successful procedure for most recipients, outcomes in patients who undergo transplantation as United Network for Organ Sharing status 2A are marginal. There are no published data on living donor liver transplant recipient outcomes relative to Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores. Such information could be useful in living donor liver transplant recipient selection. We retrospectively analyzed all non-fulminant hepatic failure, right hepatic lobe, adult-to-adult living donor liver transplant recipients at our center between August 1997 and March 2002. We calculated MELD scores at the time of LDLT and correlated scores with 1-year patient and graft survival and hospital days during the 90-day post-LDLT period. There were 62 recipients with greater than 6 months of follow-up: 38 men, 24 women; mean age, 47.9 years; 42 white, 1 black, 17 Hispanic, and 2 Asian patients. Twenty-nine patients had hepatitis C virus infection; 4 patients, hepatitis C virus infection and alcoholic liver disease; 4 patients, alcoholic liver disease; 4 patients, cryptogenic cirrhosis; 13 patients, primary sclerosing cholangitis; 5 patients, autoimmune hepatitis; and 3 patients, primary biliary cirrhosis. Mean and median MELD scores were 15.2 and 13, respectively (range, 6 to 40). One-year patient and graft survival were 59 of 62 patients (95%) and 52 of 62 patients (84%), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between median MELD scores of dead versus living patients (15 v 13; P =.15) or patients who underwent retransplantation versus those who did not (16.5 v 13; P =.30). Mean and median hospital days in the 90-day post-LDLT period were 23.7 and 16.0 days, respectively. Living donor liver transplant recipients with a MELD score of 18 or greater had significantly more hospital days compared with recipients with a MELD score less than 18 (35.2 v 19.8 days; P =.01). In conclusion, MELD scores did not predict post-LDLT patient or graft survival at 1 year. However, higher MELD scores (> or =18) were associated with more hospital days during the 3-month post-LDLT period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12827562     DOI: 10.1053/jlts.2003.50122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  24 in total

1.  Delta MELD as a predictor of early outcome in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Şencan Acar; Murat Akyıldız; Ahmet Gürakar; Yaman Tokat; Murat Dayangaç
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.852

2.  Using small-for-size grafts in living donor liver transplantation recipients with high MELD scores should not be considered a contraindication.

Authors:  Hongyu Li; Bo Li
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Preoperative assessment of the risk factors that help to predict the prognosis after living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Ryuichi Yoshida; Takayuki Iwamoto; Takahito Yagi; Daisuke Sato; Yuzo Umeda; Kenji Mizuno; Susumu Shinoura; Hiroyoshi Matsukawa; Hiroaki Matsuda; Hiroshi Sadamori; Noriaki Tanaka
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  A high MELD score, combined with the presence of hepatitis C, is associated with a poor prognosis in living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Toru Ikegami; Ken Shirabe; Shohei Yoshiya; Tomoharu Yoshizumi; Yo-Ichi Yamashita; Norifumi Harimoto; Takeo Toshima; Hideaki Uchiyama; Yuji Soejima; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 5.  Adult to adult living related liver transplantation: where do we currently stand?

Authors:  Erica M Carlisle; Giuliano Testa
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Impact of preoperative uncontrollable hepatic hydrothorax and massive ascites in adult liver transplantation.

Authors:  Kosuke Endo; Taku Iida; Shintaro Yagi; Atsushi Yoshizawa; Yasuhiro Fujimoto; Kohei Ogawa; Yasuhiro Ogura; Akira Mori; Toshimi Kaido; Shinji Uemoto
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Outcomes among older adult liver transplantation recipients in the model of end stage liver disease (MELD) era.

Authors:  Maricar F Malinis; Shu Chen; Heather G Allore; Vincent J Quagliarello
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 1.530

Review 8.  Primary sclerosing cholangitis as an intractable disease.

Authors:  Sumihito Tamura; Yasuhiko Sugawara; Norihiro Kokudo
Journal:  Intractable Rare Dis Res       Date:  2012-02

9.  Outcomes of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation: a single institution's experience with 335 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Daisuke Morioka; Hiroto Egawa; Mureo Kasahara; Takashi Ito; Hironori Haga; Yasutsugu Takada; Hiroshi Shimada; Koichi Tanaka
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Predictive factors of short term outcome after liver transplantation: A review.

Authors:  Giuliano Bolondi; Federico Mocchegiani; Roberto Montalti; Daniele Nicolini; Marco Vivarelli; Lesley De Pietri
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.