Literature DB >> 12827548

Reciprocal recognition of sifaka ( Propithecus verreauxi verreauxi) and redfronted lemur ( Eulemur fulvus rufus) alarm calls.

Claudia Fichtel1.   

Abstract

Redfronted lemurs ( Eulemur fulvus rufus) and Verreaux's sifakas ( Propithecus verreauxi verreauxi) occur sympatrically in western Madagascar. Both species exhibit a so-called mixed alarm call system with functionally referential alarm calls for raptors and general alarm calls for carnivores and raptors. General alarm calls also occur in other contexts associated with high arousal, such as inter-group encounters. Field playback experiments were conducted to investigate whether interspecific recognition of alarm calls occurs in both species, even though the two species rarely interact. In a crossed design, redfronted lemur and sifaka alarm calls were broadcast to individuals of both species, using the alarm call of chacma baboons ( Papio cynocephalus) as a control. Both species responded with appropriate escape strategies and alarm calls after playbacks of heterospecific aerial alarm calls. Similarly, they reacted appropriately to playbacks of heterospecific general alarm calls. Playbacks of baboon alarm calls elicited no specific responses in either lemur species, indicating that an understanding of interspecific alarm calls caused the responses and not alarm calls in general. Thus, the two lemur species have an understanding of each other's aerial as well as general alarm calls, suggesting that even in species that do not form mutualistic associations and rarely interact, common predator pressure has been sufficient for the development of heterospecific call recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12827548     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-003-0180-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  11 in total

1.  Recognition of other species' aerial alarm calls: speaking the same language or learning another?

Authors:  Robert D Magrath; Benjamin J Pitcher; Janet L Gardner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) use positive, but not negative, auditory cues to infer food location.

Authors:  Lisa A Heimbauer; Rebecca L Antworth; Michael J Owren
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Who is there? Captive western gorillas distinguish human voices based on familiarity and nature of previous interactions.

Authors:  Roberta Salmi; Caroline E Jones; Jodi Carrigan
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  Heterospecific alarm call recognition in a non-vocal reptile.

Authors:  Maren N Vitousek; James S Adelman; Nathan C Gregory; James J H St Clair
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Alarming features: birds use specific acoustic properties to identify heterospecific alarm calls.

Authors:  Pamela M Fallow; Benjamin J Pitcher; Robert D Magrath
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Interspecific semantic alarm call recognition in the solitary Sahamalaza sportive lemur, Lepilemur sahamalazensis.

Authors:  Melanie Seiler; Christoph Schwitzer; Marco Gamba; Marc W Holderied
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Variation in the Meaning of Alarm Calls in Verreaux's and Coquerel's Sifakas (Propithecus verreauxi, P. coquereli).

Authors:  Claudia Fichtel; Peter M Kappeler
Journal:  Int J Primatol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 2.264

8.  The role of acoustic signals for species recognition in redfronted lemurs (Eulemur rufifrons).

Authors:  Hanitriniaina Rakotonirina; Peter M Kappeler; Claudia Fichtel
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Studying primate cognition in a social setting to improve validity and welfare: a literature review highlighting successful approaches.

Authors:  Katherine A Cronin; Sarah L Jacobson; Kristin E Bonnie; Lydia M Hopper
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Dog growls express various contextual and affective content for human listeners.

Authors:  T Faragó; N Takács; Á Miklósi; P Pongrácz
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.