PURPOSE: To present the results of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for treatment of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flap complications. METHODS: Compilation of case reports through solicitation on Kera-net, an Internet surgery discussion site. RESULTS: PRK was performed on 13 patients from 2 weeks to 6 months after LASIK flap complications. The technique used for the PRK varied. Epithelial removal was performed using no-touch phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) in six of the 13 patients and manual debridement in the other seven patients. A dilute solution of 20% ethanol was used to facilitate manual debridement in five of the seven patients. In two of these five patients, the epithelium was replaced as in laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK). A solution of 0.02% mitomycin C was used after laser ablation to prevent haze formation in three patients. After an average 7 months of follow-up, uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 in six patients, 20/25 in four patients, and 20/30 in two patients. The visual acuity in one patient was 20/80, purposely left undercorrected for monovision. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 20/20 in 10 of 13 patients. Three patients were 20/25, losing one line of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. On slit-lamp examination, at last follow-up appointment, stromal haze was graded from trace to none in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Photorefractive keratectomy is a safe and effective technique for treatment of patients with LASIK flap complications.
PURPOSE: To present the results of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for treatment of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flap complications. METHODS: Compilation of case reports through solicitation on Kera-net, an Internet surgery discussion site. RESULTS: PRK was performed on 13 patients from 2 weeks to 6 months after LASIK flap complications. The technique used for the PRK varied. Epithelial removal was performed using no-touch phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) in six of the 13 patients and manual debridement in the other seven patients. A dilute solution of 20% ethanol was used to facilitate manual debridement in five of the seven patients. In two of these five patients, the epithelium was replaced as in laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK). A solution of 0.02% mitomycin C was used after laser ablation to prevent haze formation in three patients. After an average 7 months of follow-up, uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 in six patients, 20/25 in four patients, and 20/30 in two patients. The visual acuity in one patient was 20/80, purposely left undercorrected for monovision. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 20/20 in 10 of 13 patients. Three patients were 20/25, losing one line of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. On slit-lamp examination, at last follow-up appointment, stromal haze was graded from trace to none in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Photorefractive keratectomy is a safe and effective technique for treatment of patients with LASIK flap complications.