Literature DB >> 12825530

Decision making: operative versus nonoperative treatment of acromioclavicular joint injuries.

James P Bradley1, Hussein Elkousy.   

Abstract

The classification system devised by Allman and Tossy, and revised by Rockwood, defines the extent of injury to the AC joint and helps to guide management of AC joint injuries [1,4,6]. In general, type I and II injuries may be treated nonoperatively with a sling, mainly for comfort, for a short period of time. Once this is removed, strength and motion are regained with rehabilitation. Patients typically have manageable long-term symptoms without any intervention, but some may require a steroid injection or distal clavicle excision for chronic pain from degenerative changes at the AC joint due to the injury. On the other end of the spectrum, type IV, V, and VI injuries nearly always require operative intervention. The surgical procedures for these injuries are performed in the acute phase if possible to minimize symptoms and maximize long-term function. Type III injuries are the center of the controversy for management of AC joint injuries. No perfect study exists which demonstrates clear superiority of surgical or nonsurgical treatment. Most of the studies in the literature support nonoperative treatment for most patients, however. Yet, other factors must be considered, including the patient's occupation and physical demands as well as the age of the injury. Overhead athletes and manual laborers place high demands on their shoulders, prompting some authors to consider acute surgical management for these patients. We, on the other hand, agree with the current consensus opinion that all type III injuries should initially be treated conservatively, regardless of occupation. The only advantage to operative intervention consistently borne out in the literature is an increased probability of anatomic reduction. There is no correlation between reduction and improvement in pain, strength, or motion, however. These patients usually are able to return to full sport with no deficits if rehabilitation is emphasized. For those patients who fail conservative management, a multitude of surgical techniques, such as the modified Weaver-Dunn procedure, exist to reconstruct the AC joint.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12825530     DOI: 10.1016/s0278-5919(02)00098-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Sports Med        ISSN: 0278-5919            Impact factor:   2.182


  19 in total

1.  Treatment of Chronic Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation in a Paraplegic Patient with the Weaver-Dunn Procedure and a Hook-Plate.

Authors:  Holger Godry; Mustafa Citak; Matthias Königshausen; Thomas A Schildhauer; Dominik Seybold
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2016-06-27

2.  Anatomic and non-anatomic reconstruction improves post-operative outcomes in chronic acromio-clavicular instability: a systematic review.

Authors:  Francisco Xará-Leite; Renato Andrade; Pedro Silva Moreira; Luís Coutinho; Olufemi R Ayeni; Nuno Sevivas; João Espregueira-Mendes
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Acromioclavicular motion after surgical reconstruction.

Authors:  Pierorazio Motta; Laura Bruno; Alberto Maderni; Piermario Tosco; Umberto Mariotti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  [The acromioclavicular joint].

Authors:  A Klonz; D Loitz
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  A Single-Tunnel Technique for Coracoclavicular and Acromioclavicular Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael B Banffy; Carola F van Eck; Michael Stanton; Neal S ElAttrache
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-06-12

6.  Scapular dyskinesis and SICK scapula syndrome following surgical treatment of type III acute acromioclavicular dislocations.

Authors:  Luigi Murena; Gianluca Canton; Ettore Vulcano; Paolo Cherubino
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Triple endobuttton technique for the treatment of acute complete acromioclavicular joint dislocations: preliminary results.

Authors:  Hai-Feng Wei; Yun-Feng Chen; Bing-Fang Zeng; Chang-Qing Zhang; Yi-Min Chai; Hai-Ming Wang; Ye Lu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  [A new minimally invasive arthroscopic technique for reconstruction of the acromioclavicular joint].

Authors:  F Elser; B Chernchujit; P Ansah; A B Imhoff
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  Acromioclavicular Dislocation: Conservative or Surgical Therapy.

Authors:  Jennifer M. Hootman
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  [Injuries of the acromioclavicular joint in athletes].

Authors:  N Kraus; M Scheibel
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.