OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare interleukin-6 and funisitis as predictors of impaired neurologic outcomes in children by performing a secondary analysis on data that were collected prospectively for another purpose. STUDY DESIGN: We examined umbilical cords for funisitis and obtained cord blood for interleukin-6 levels. A psychomotor developmental index score was determined for each child at age 18 months. RESULTS: The prevalence (46%) of elevated interleukin-6 levels (> or = 10 pg/mL) among children with low psychomotor developmental index scores (<100) was not significantly different from that of children with normal scores (47%). Among children with funisitis (n = 21), the median psychomotor developmental index score was 94; for children without funisitis (n = 92), it was 99 (P <.02). When the data were regressed for confounding, funisitis remained significant (adjusted odds ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.9). Furthermore, funisitis was a more specific predictor of low psychomotor developmental index scores (P <.001), although elevated interleukin-6 levels were more sensitive. CONCLUSION: When used for the prediction of impaired neurologic outcomes in children, funisitis has better specificity and thus a better positive predictive value than does interleukin-6.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare interleukin-6 and funisitis as predictors of impaired neurologic outcomes in children by performing a secondary analysis on data that were collected prospectively for another purpose. STUDY DESIGN: We examined umbilical cords for funisitis and obtained cord blood for interleukin-6 levels. A psychomotor developmental index score was determined for each child at age 18 months. RESULTS: The prevalence (46%) of elevated interleukin-6 levels (> or = 10 pg/mL) among children with low psychomotor developmental index scores (<100) was not significantly different from that of children with normal scores (47%). Among children with funisitis (n = 21), the median psychomotor developmental index score was 94; for children without funisitis (n = 92), it was 99 (P <.02). When the data were regressed for confounding, funisitis remained significant (adjusted odds ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.9). Furthermore, funisitis was a more specific predictor of low psychomotor developmental index scores (P <.001), although elevated interleukin-6 levels were more sensitive. CONCLUSION: When used for the prediction of impaired neurologic outcomes in children, funisitis has better specificity and thus a better positive predictive value than does interleukin-6.
Authors: E Rindsjö; I Hulthén Varli; M F Ofori; M Lundquist; U Holmlund; N Papadogiannakis; A Scheynius Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Yoram Sorokin; Roberto Romero; Lisa Mele; Jay D Iams; Alan M Peaceman; Kenneth J Leveno; Margaret Harper; Steve N Caritis; Brian M Mercer; John M Thorp; Mary Jo O'Sullivan; Susan M Ramin; Marshall W Carpenter; Dwight J Rouse; Baha Sibai Journal: Am J Perinatol Date: 2013-12-11 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Joonho Lee; Roberto Romero; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Zhong Dong; Adi L Tarca; Yi Xu; Po Jen Chiang; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Sonia S Hassan; Lami Yeo; Bo Hyun Yoon; Nandor Gabor Than; Chong Jai Kim Journal: Am J Reprod Immunol Date: 2013-07-30 Impact factor: 3.886
Authors: Sally A Madsen-Bouterse; Roberto Romero; Adi L Tarca; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Jimmy Espinoza; Chong Jai Kim; Jung-Sun Kim; Samuel S Edwin; Ricardo Gomez; Sorin Draghici Journal: Am J Reprod Immunol Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 3.886
Authors: Humberto Azpurua; Antonette T Dulay; Irina A Buhimschi; Mert O Bahtiyar; Edmund Funai; Sonya S Abdel-Razeq; Guoyang Luo; Vineet Bhandari; Joshua A Copel; Catalin S Buhimschi Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Roberto Romero; Piya Chaemsaithong; Nikolina Docheva; Steven J Korzeniewski; Adi L Tarca; Gaurav Bhatti; Zhonghui Xu; Juan P Kusanovic; Noppadol Chaiyasit; Zhong Dong; Bo Hyun Yoon; Sonia S Hassan; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Lami Yeo; Yeon Mee Kim Journal: J Perinat Med Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 1.901
Authors: Jung-Sun Kim; Roberto Romero; Adi Laurentiu Tarca; Christopher LaJeunesse; Yu Mi Han; Mi Jeong Kim; Yeon Lim Suh; Sorin Draghici; Pooja Mittal; Francesca Gotsch; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Sonia Hassan; Chong Jai Kim Journal: J Cell Mol Med Date: 2008-02-24 Impact factor: 5.310