PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of ocular photodynamic therapy (OPT) with verteporfin in patients with choroidal neovascularization (CNV) from ocular histoplasmosis syndrome (OHS) and to compare these results with those for a natural history group. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed to identify cases of CNV secondary to OHS treated with OPT. Complete data were available for 38 of 41 eligible eyes. Data regarding the following variables were abstracted from the patient charts: demographic characteristics, previous surgery, angiographic features, number and timing of treatments with OPT, follow-up time, and visual acuity. The visual acuity results of eyes receiving photodynamic therapy were compared with those for a natural history cohort. RESULTS: On average, OHS patients who received treatment developed 0.88 line of visual improvement. Visual acuity improved or stayed the same in 69% (22 of 32) of eyes, improved by > or = 2 lines in 44% (14 of 32), and improved by > or = 4 lines in 22% (7 of 32). Patients who received OPT were 2.07 times more likely to have improved or constant vision than were those in the natural history group as described in one retrospective series (odds ratio = 2.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-5.56; P = 0.162). Thirty-eight percent (12 of 32) of eyes had undergone submacular surgery for CNV before any OPT. CONCLUSIONS: Ocular photodynamic therapy with verteporfin may be beneficial in patients with CNV secondary to OHS, even in the setting of previous submacular surgery.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of ocular photodynamic therapy (OPT) with verteporfin in patients with choroidal neovascularization (CNV) from ocular histoplasmosis syndrome (OHS) and to compare these results with those for a natural history group. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed to identify cases of CNV secondary to OHS treated with OPT. Complete data were available for 38 of 41 eligible eyes. Data regarding the following variables were abstracted from the patient charts: demographic characteristics, previous surgery, angiographic features, number and timing of treatments with OPT, follow-up time, and visual acuity. The visual acuity results of eyes receiving photodynamic therapy were compared with those for a natural history cohort. RESULTS: On average, OHSpatients who received treatment developed 0.88 line of visual improvement. Visual acuity improved or stayed the same in 69% (22 of 32) of eyes, improved by > or = 2 lines in 44% (14 of 32), and improved by > or = 4 lines in 22% (7 of 32). Patients who received OPT were 2.07 times more likely to have improved or constant vision than were those in the natural history group as described in one retrospective series (odds ratio = 2.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-5.56; P = 0.162). Thirty-eight percent (12 of 32) of eyes had undergone submacular surgery for CNV before any OPT. CONCLUSIONS: Ocular photodynamic therapy with verteporfin may be beneficial in patients with CNV secondary to OHS, even in the setting of previous submacular surgery.