Literature DB >> 12823868

Multimodality treatment of giant intracranial arteriovenous malformations.

Steven D Chang1, Mary L Marcellus, Michael P Marks, Richard P Levy, Huy M Do, Gary K Steinberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Giant arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) (i.e., those greater than 6 cm at maximum diameter) are difficult to treat and often carry higher treatment morbidity and mortality rates than do smaller AVMs. In this study, we reviewed the treatment, angiographic results, and clinical outcomes in 53 patients with giant AVMs who were treated at Stanford between 1987 and 2001.
METHODS: The patients selected included 20 males (38%) and 33 females (62%). Their presenting symptoms were hemorrhage (n = 20; 38%), seizures (n = 18; 34%), headaches (n = 8; 15%), and progressive neurological deficits (n = 7; 13%). One patient was in Spetzler-Martin Grade III, 9 were in Spetzler-Martin Grade IV, and 43 were in Spetzler-Martin Grade V. The mean AVM size was 6.8 cm (range, 6-15 cm). AVM venous drainage was superficial (n = 7), deep (n = 20), or both (n = 26). At presentation, 31 patients (58%) were graded in excellent neurological condition, 17 were graded good (32%), and 5 were graded poor (9%).
RESULTS: The patients were treated with surgery (n = 27; 51%), embolization (n = 52; 98%), and/or radiosurgery (n = 47; 89%). Most patients received multimodality treatment with embolization followed by surgery (n = 5), embolization followed by radiosurgery (n = 23), or embolization, radiosurgery, and surgery (n = 23). Nineteen patients (36%) were completely cured of their giant AVMs, 90% obliteration was achieved in 4 patients (8%), less than 90% obliteration was achieved in 29 patients (55%) who had residual AVMs even after multimodality therapy, and 1 patient was lost to follow-up. Of the 33 patients who either completed treatment or were alive more than 3 years after undergoing their most recent radiosurgery, 19 patients (58%) were cured of their AVMs. The long-term treatment-related morbidity rate was 15%. The clinical results after mean follow-up of 37 months were 27 excellent (51%), 15 good (28%), 3 poor (6%), and 8 dead (15%).
CONCLUSION: The results in this series of patients with giant AVMs, which represents the largest series reported to date, suggest that selected symptomatic patients with giant AVMs can be treated successfully with good outcomes and acceptable risk. Multimodality treatment is usually necessary to achieve AVM obliteration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12823868     DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000068700.68238.84

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  16 in total

1.  Combined effects of embolization and hypofractionated conformal stereotactic radiotherapy in arteriovenous malformations of the brain.

Authors:  P Lindvall; G Wikholm; P Bergström; P Löfroth; A T Bergenheim
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 1.610

2.  Endovascular treatment of intracerebral arteriovenous malformations: procedural safety, complications, and results evaluated by MR imaging, including diffusion and perfusion imaging.

Authors:  M Cronqvist; R Wirestam; B Ramgren; L Brandt; B Romner; O Nilsson; H Säveland; S Holtås; E-M Larsson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Radiosurgery facilitates resection of brain arteriovenous malformations and reduces surgical morbidity.

Authors:  Rene O Sanchez-Mejia; Michael W McDermott; Jeffery Tan; Helen Kim; William L Young; Michael T Lawton
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Neonatal giant pial arteriovenous malformation: genesis or rapid enlargement in the third trimester.

Authors:  C A Potter; J Armstrong-Wells; H J Fullerton; W L Young; R T Higashida; C F Dowd; V V Halbach; S W Hetts
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 5.836

5.  Acute management of brain arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  Andreas Hartmann; J P Mohr
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.598

6.  Angioarchitectural characteristics associated with complications of embolization in supratentorial brain arteriovenous malformation.

Authors:  J Pan; H He; L Feng; F Viñuela; Z Wu; R Zhan
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Embolization as one modality in a combined strategy for the management of cerebral arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  J Raymond; D Iancu; A Weill; F Guilbert; J P Bahary; M Bojanowski; D Roy
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 1.610

8.  The ARUBA trial: current status, future hopes.

Authors:  J P Mohr; Alan J Moskowitz; Christian Stapf; Andreas Hartmann; Karen Lord; Steven M Marshall; Henning Mast; Ellen Moquete; Claudia Scala Moy; Michael Parides; John Pile-Spellman; Rustam Al-Shahi Salman; Alan Weinberg; William L Young; Alejandrina Estevez; Inam Kureshi; Jonathan L Brisman
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Neurologic complications of arteriovenous malformation embolization using liquid embolic agents.

Authors:  M V Jayaraman; M L Marcellus; S Hamilton; H M Do; D Campbell; S D Chang; G K Steinberg; M P Marks
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 10.  [Vascular malformations in newborn infants, infants and children].

Authors:  W Reith; M G Shamdeen
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.