Literature DB >> 12822862

Manometry of the lower esophageal sphincter: inter- and intraindividual variability of slow motorized pull-through versus station pull-through manometry.

Guilherme M R Campos1, Stefan Oberg, Otavio Gastal, Jorg Theisen, John J Nigro, Jeffrey A Hagen, Mario Costantini, Cedric G Bremner, Tom R DeMeester, Peter F Crookes.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the interindividual and intraindividual variability of slow motorized pull-through lower esophageal sphincter (LES) manometry compared to standard station pull-through LES manometry to measure LES overall length, abdominal length, and pressure and to report normal values for the slow motorized pull-through method. The slow motorized pull-through had significantly smaller coefficient of variation, indicating closer agreement between different examiners in analyzing a given tracing. The correlation coefficients for each parameter in normal subjects and symptomatic patients was significantly higher when using slow motorized pull-through for both patients and normal subjects for all three parameters. The 5th percentile of normal values obtained from 41 volunteers for LES overall length, abdominal length, and pressure was 2.7 cm, 1.4 cm, 5.1 mm Hg, respectively. The results indicate that the slow motorized pull-through method is more reproducible than the standard station pull-through method both between different observers and when the same examiner measures the same tracing on two different occasions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12822862     DOI: 10.1023/a:1023700309299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  13 in total

1.  The lower esophageal sphincter in health and disease.

Authors:  G Zaninotto; T R DeMeester; W Schwizer; K E Johansson; S C Cheng
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Observer variation in esophageal pressure assessment.

Authors:  J E Fox; E I Vidins; I T Beck
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux in ambulant healthy human subjects.

Authors:  M N Schoeman; M D Tippett; L M Akkermans; J Dent; R H Holloway
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Interaction of lower esophageal sphincter pressure and length of sphincter in the abdomen as determinants of gastroesophageal competence.

Authors:  G C O'Sullivan; T R DeMeester; B E Joelsson; R B Smith; R R Blough; L F Johnson; D B Skinner
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Mechanism of gastroesophageal reflux in recumbent asymptomatic human subjects.

Authors:  J Dent; W J Dodds; R H Friedman; T Sekiguchi; W J Hogan; R C Arndorfer; D J Petrie
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Normal lower esophageal sphincter pressure: a comparison of rapid vs. slow pull-through techniques.

Authors:  R W Welch; S T Drake
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Predictive factors of Barrett esophagus: multivariate analysis of 502 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  G M Campos; S R DeMeester; J H Peters; S Oberg; P F Crookes; J A Hagen; C G Bremner; L F Sillin; R J Mason; T R DeMeester
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-11

8.  Role of the lower esophageal sphincter and hiatal hernia in the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  M Fein; M P Ritter; T R DeMeester; S Oberg; J H Peters; J A Hagen; C G Bremner
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Predictive factors of the long term outcome in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: six year follow up of 107 patients.

Authors:  E Kuster; E Ros; V Toledo-Pimentel; A Pujol; J M Bordas; L Grande; C Pera
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux in patients with reflux esophagitis.

Authors:  W J Dodds; J Dent; W J Hogan; J F Helm; R Hauser; G K Patel; M S Egide
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-12-16       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  5 in total

1.  The effect of an effortful swallow on the normal adult esophagus.

Authors:  Teresa E Lever; Kathleen T Cox; Donald Holbert; Mamun Shahrier; Monica Hough; Kristine Kelley-Salamon
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.438

2.  Response of the lower esophageal sphincter to gastric distention by carbonated beverages.

Authors:  Nahid Hamoui; Reginald V Lord; Jeffrey A Hagen; Joerg Theisen; Tom R Demeester; Peter F Crookes
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  The use of esophageal transit and gastric emptying studies in the evaluation of patients undergoing laparoscopic fundoplication.

Authors:  Matthew J Schuchert; Brian L Pettiford; Ghulam Abbas; Alicia Oostdyk; James R Landreneau; Arman Kilic; Joshua P Landreneau; James D Luketich; Rodney J Landreneau
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  The value of high-resolution manometry in the assessment of the resting characteristics of the lower esophageal sphincter.

Authors:  Shahin Ayazi; Jeffrey A Hagen; Joerg Zehetner; Oliver Ross; Calvin Wu; Arzu Oezcelik; Emmanuele Abate; Helen J Sohn; Farzaneh Banki; John C Lipham; Steven R DeMeester; Tom R Demeester
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Obesity and gastroesophageal reflux: quantifying the association between body mass index, esophageal acid exposure, and lower esophageal sphincter status in a large series of patients with reflux symptoms.

Authors:  Shahin Ayazi; Jeffrey A Hagen; Linda S Chan; Steven R DeMeester; Molly W Lin; Ali Ayazi; Jessica M Leers; Arzu Oezcelik; Farzaneh Banki; John C Lipham; Tom R DeMeester; Peter F Crookes
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 3.452

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.