Literature DB >> 12822150

Stent deployment failure: reasons, implications, and short- and long-term outcomes.

Evgenia Nikolsky1, Luis Gruberg, Sirush Pechersky, Michael Kapeliovich, Ehud Grenadier, Shlomo Amikam, Monther Boulos, Mahmoud Suleiman, Walter Markiewicz, Rafael Beyar.   

Abstract

Stents have revolutionized percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), impacting on both acute and long-term results. However, despite improvements in stent design, stent deployment failure is not an unusual event. The aim of the present study was to assess the frequency and causes of stent deployment failure, as well as the outcome of these patients. Between 1997 and 2001, a total of 3,537 patients underwent stent-assisted PCI and delivery of 5,275 stents was attempted. In the majority of patients (118; 78.1%), stenting was performed as provisional; in the remaining 33 (21.8%) as a bailout procedure. A total of 175 (3.3%) stents in 151 (4.3%) patients failed. Failure to deliver the stent to the lesion site was the main cause in 139 patients (92%) and failure either to expand adequately the stent or premature disengagement of the stent from the balloon in only 12 patients (8%). Peripheral stent embolization occurred in 10 (0.3%) patients. Deployment of a different stent in place of the failed one was attempted in 122 patients and was successful in the majority (108; 88.5%). In-hospital major adverse cardiac events were observed in six patients (4%): three patients required emergency coronary artery bypass surgery, two had a myocardial infarction (MI), and one patient underwent urgent repeat coronary intervention. At a mean follow-up of 32.2 +/- 17.7 months, 22 major adverse cardiac event occurred in 17 patients (11.2%): 1 cardiac death, 3 patients had an MI, and 18 patients required target vessel revascularization. One-year event-free survival for the whole group was 91.2%. Patients with stent embolization did not have any major adverse cardiac or vascular events. Thus, the rate of stent deployment failure in our series was 3.3%, mainly due to failure to deliver the stent to the site. Another stent was successfully deployed in the majority of cases and these patients had favorable short- and long-term outcomes. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12822150     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.10543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  12 in total

1.  Entrapped coronary catheter remnants and stents: must they be surgically removed?

Authors:  Konstantin Alexiou; Utz Kappert; Michael Knaut; Klaus Matschke; Sems Malte Tugtekin
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2006

2.  The use of the GuideLiner™ catheter as a child-in-mother technique: an initial single-center experience.

Authors:  Petros S Dardas; Nikos Mezilis; Vlasis Ninios; Dimitrios Tsikaderis; Efstratios K Theofilogiannakos
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Successful coronary stent retrieval from the ascending aorta using a gooseneck snare kit.

Authors:  Ji-Hun Jang; Seong-Ill Woo; Dong-Hyeok Yang; Sang-Don Park; Dae-Hyeok Kim; Sung-Hee Shin
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 2.884

4.  Two dislodged and crushed coronary stents: treatment of two simultaneously dislodged stents using crushing techniques.

Authors:  Dong-Hyeok Yang; Seong-Ill Woo; Dae-Hyeok Kim; Sang-Don Park; Ji-Hun Jang; Jun Kwan; Sung-Hee Shin
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.884

5.  GuideLiner Balloon Assisted Tracking (GBAT): A New Addition to the Interventional Toolbox.

Authors:  Basem Elbarouni; Motaz Moussa; Malek Kass; Olga Toleva; Minh Vo; Amir Ravandi
Journal:  Case Rep Cardiol       Date:  2016-12-28

6.  Usefulness and safety of a guide catheter extension system for the percutaneous treatment of complex coronary lesions by a transradial approach.

Authors:  Sergio García-Blas; Julio Núñez; Luis Mainar; Gema Miñana; Clara Bonanad; Paolo Racugno; Juan Carlos Rodríguez; Patricia Moyano; Juan Sanchis
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 1.927

7.  Are catheter extension devices one step forward for complex coronary interventions?

Authors:  Sergio García-Blas; Julio Núñez
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.596

8.  GuideLiner catheter application in complex coronary lesions: experience of two centers.

Authors:  Hüseyin Dursun; Ahmet Taştan; Zülkif Tanrıverdi; Erdem Özel; Dayimi Kaya
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 1.596

9.  From debulking to delivery: sequential use of rotational atherectomy and Guidezilla™ for complex saphenous vein grafts intervention.

Authors:  Mariano Pellicano; Vincent Floré; Emanuele Barbato; Bernard De Bruyne
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 2.298

10.  Distal 'buddy-in-jail' technique: a complementary 'Jail with stent' method for stent delivery.

Authors:  Vincent Dangoisse; Antoine Guédès; Erwin Schroëder
Journal:  Acute Card Care       Date:  2014-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.