Literature DB >> 12821952

Both body and arm position significantly influence blood pressure measurement.

R T Netea1, J W M Lenders, P Smits, Th Thien.   

Abstract

The position of both the body and the arm during indirect blood pressure (BP) measurement is often neglected. The aim of the present study was to test the influence of the position of the patient on BP readings: (1) sitting with the arms supported precisely at the right atrium level and (2) supine: (a) with the arms precisely at the right atrium level and (b) with the arms on the examination bed. In a first group of 57 hypertensive patients, two sessions of BP and heart rate (HR) measurements were performed in two positions: sitting and supine with the arms supported precisely at right atrium level in both positions. BP was measured simultaneously at both arms, with a Hawksley Random Zero sphygmomanometer at the right arm, and with an automated oscillometric device (Bosomat) at the left arm. BP and HR readings obtained in the two positions were then compared. In a second group of 25 normo- and hypertensive persons, two sessions of BP and HR readings were performed in supine with the arms in two different arm positions: (a) the arm placed precisely at right atrium level and (b) the other arm on the examination bed. The measurements were performed at both arms with two automated devices (Bosomat). The readings taken in the two positions were compared. Both systolic BP (SBP; by 9.5 +/- 9.0 (standard deviation, s.d.); right arm) and diastolic BP (DBP; by 4.8 +/- 6.0 mmHg; right arm) were significantly higher in the supine than in the sitting position. When the two different arm positions (body continously supine) were compared in the second part of the study, significantly higher SBP (by 4.6 +/- 6.1 mmHg) and DBP (by 3.9 +/- 2.8 mmHg) were obtained when the arm of the patient was placed on the bed (below the right atrium level), than when the arm was placed at the level of the right atrium. BP readings in sitting and supine positions are not the same. When according to guidelines the arm of the patient is meticulously placed at the right atrium level in both positions, the difference is even greater than when the arm rests on the desk or on the arm support of the chair. Moreover, in the supine position small but significant differences in BP are measured between arm on a 5 cm-high pillow and arm on the bed. In every study reporting BP values, the position of both the body and especially the arm should be precisely mentioned.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12821952     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  31 in total

1.  Measurement-to-measurement blood pressure variability is related to cognitive performance: the Maine Syracuse study.

Authors:  Georgina E Crichton; Merrill F Elias; Gregory A Dore; Rachael V Torres; Michael A Robbins
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  Nutritional status in patients with phenylketonuria using glycomacropeptide as their major protein source.

Authors:  A Pinto; M F Almeida; P C Ramos; S Rocha; A Guimas; R Ribeiro; E Martins; A Bandeira; A MacDonald; J C Rocha
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  [Principles and pitfalls of arterial blood pressure measurement].

Authors:  A S Meidert; J Briegel; B Saugel
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 4.  Clinical Implications of Different Blood Pressure Measurement Techniques.

Authors:  Paul Drawz
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.369

5.  Isolated systolic hypertension in young and middle-aged adults and 31-year risk for cardiovascular mortality: the Chicago Heart Association Detection Project in Industry study.

Authors:  Yuichiro Yano; Jeremiah Stamler; Daniel B Garside; Martha L Daviglus; Stanley S Franklin; Mercedes R Carnethon; Kiang Liu; Philip Greenland; Donald M Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 6.  Orthostatic Circulatory Disorders: From Nosology to Nuts and Bolts.

Authors:  Michael Gutkin; Julian M Stewart
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 7.  Energy Drinks and Their Impact on the Cardiovascular System: Potential Mechanisms.

Authors:  Erik Konrad Grasser; Jennifer Lynn Miles-Chan; Nathalie Charrière; Cathríona R Loonam; Abdul G Dulloo; Jean-Pierre Montani
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 8.701

8.  Intrauterine exposure to diabetes is a determinant of hemoglobin A(1)c and systolic blood pressure in pima Indian children.

Authors:  Joy C Bunt; P Antonio Tataranni; Arline D Salbe
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2005-03-29       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  Measurement Repeatability of Central and Peripheral Blood Pressures: The ARIC Study.

Authors:  Fran Yong; Gerardo Heiss; David Couper; Michelle L Meyer; Susan Cheng; Hirofumi Tanaka
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 2.689

10.  Effect of supine versus sitting position on noninvasive assessment of aortic pressure waveform: a randomized cross-over study.

Authors:  D Vrachatis; T G Papaioannou; A Konstantopoulou; E G Nasothimiou; S Millasseau; J Blacher; M E Safar; P P Sfikakis; G S Stergiou; A D Protogerou
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 3.012

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.