Literature DB >> 12821705

Performance of the WHO Rose angina questionnaire in post-menopausal women: are all of the questions necessary?

D A Lawlor1, J Adamson, S Ebrahim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of a shortened version of the Rose angina questionnaire focusing on exertional chest pain.
METHODS: Cross sectional analysis of 3987 women aged 60 to 79 years from 23 British towns. The performances of definite Rose angina (using data from the full Rose angina questionnaire) and exertional chest pain (using data from a subset of three questions from the Rose angina questionnaire) were assessed against a medical record of angina.
RESULTS: The sensitivity (the proportion with a medical record of angina who were identified as having angina by the questionnaire) was 29.9% (95% confidence intervals 25.7% to 34.4%) comparing definite Rose angina to any medical record of angina since 1978 and 50.7% (45.9% to 55.5%) comparing exertional chest pain to any medical record diagnosis of angina. The positive predictive values of both questionnaires were similar. When the two questionnaires were compared with a gold standard of a primary care consultation for angina symptoms within the past five years the sensitivity of definite Rose angina was 33.0% (26.9% to 39.6%) and that of exertional chest pain was 51.8% (45.1% to 58.5%). Although the sensitivity of both versions of the questionnaire was greater in those aged 60-69 years compared with those aged 70-79 years, it remained higher in the exertional chest pain version of the questionnaire than for definite Rose angina based on the full version of the questionnaire in both age groups. Performance of either version of the questionnaire was not affected by occupational social class.
CONCLUSIONS: With respect to identifying women with a medical diagnosis of angina or those presenting to primary care with anginal symptoms, these results suggest that a shortened version of the Rose angina questionnaire focusing on exertional chest pain performs better than the full version. Other studies suggest that exertional chest pain is the crucial element of the Rose angina questionnaire with respect to predicting future coronary events. It is concluded that using a shortened version of the Rose angina questionnaire is adequate in epidemiological studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12821705      PMCID: PMC1732510          DOI: 10.1136/jech.57.7.538

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  6 in total

1.  Pre-existing ischaemic heart disease and ischaemic heart disease mortality in women compared with men.

Authors:  C L Hart; G C Watt; G Davey Smith; C R Gillis; V M Hawthorne
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  The diagnosis of ischaemic heart pain and intermittent claudication in field surveys.

Authors:  G A ROSE
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1962       Impact factor: 9.408

3.  Self-administration of a questionnaire on chest pain and intermittent claudication.

Authors:  G Rose; P McCartney; D D Reid
Journal:  Br J Prev Soc Med       Date:  1977-03

4.  Angina, myocardial ischemia and coronary disease: gold standards, operational definitions and correlations.

Authors:  M A Hlatky; D B Mark; R M Califf; D B Pryor
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Chest pain on questionnaire and prediction of major ischaemic heart disease events in men.

Authors:  F C Lampe; P H Whincup; S G Wannamethee; S Ebrahim; M Walker; A G Shaper
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Geographical variation in cardiovascular disease, risk factors, and their control in older women: British Women's Heart and Health Study.

Authors:  D A Lawlor; C Bedford; M Taylor; S Ebrahim
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.710

  6 in total
  22 in total

1.  A population study of the long-term consequences of Rose angina: 20-year follow-up of the Renfrew-Paisley study.

Authors:  N F Murphy; S Stewart; C L Hart; K MacIntyre; D Hole; J J V McMurray
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Diagnostic Characteristics of Patient Self-Assessment of Preoperative Cardiac Risk for Non-Cardiac Surgery - Foundations for Patient Driven Decision Support.

Authors:  Sharad Manaktala; Todd Rockwood; Terrence J Adam
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2015-11-05

3.  Significance of noncalcified coronary plaque in asymptomatic subjects with low coronary artery calcium score: assessment with coronary computed tomography angiography.

Authors:  Dong Hyun Yoo; Eun Ju Chun; Sang Il Choi; Jeong A Kim; Kwang Nam Jin; Tae-Jin Yeon; Dong-Ju Choi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  Prognosis of stable angina pectoris: why we need larger population studies with higher endpoint resolution.

Authors:  Adam D Timmis; Gene Feder; Harry Hemingway
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-09-04       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Epidemiology of angina pectoris: role of natural language processing of the medical record.

Authors:  Serguei S V Pakhomov; Harry Hemingway; Susan A Weston; Steven J Jacobsen; Richard Rodeheffer; Véronique L Roger
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  Computed tomography versus invasive coronary angiography: design and methods of the pragmatic randomised multicentre DISCHARGE trial.

Authors:  Adriane E Napp; Robert Haase; Michael Laule; Georg M Schuetz; Matthias Rief; Henryk Dreger; Gudrun Feuchtner; Guy Friedrich; Miloslav Špaček; Vojtěch Suchánek; Klaus Fuglsang Kofoed; Thomas Engstroem; Stephen Schroeder; Tanja Drosch; Matthias Gutberlet; Michael Woinke; Pál Maurovich-Horvat; Béla Merkely; Patrick Donnelly; Peter Ball; Jonathan D Dodd; Martin Quinn; Luca Saba; Maurizio Porcu; Marco Francone; Massimo Mancone; Andrejs Erglis; Ligita Zvaigzne; Antanas Jankauskas; Gintare Sakalyte; Tomasz Harań; Malgorzata Ilnicka-Suckiel; Nuno Bettencourt; Vasco Gama-Ribeiro; Sebastian Condrea; Imre Benedek; Nada Čemerlić Adjić; Oto Adjić; José Rodriguez-Palomares; Bruno Garcia Del Blanco; Giles Roditi; Colin Berry; Gershan Davis; Erica Thwaite; Juhani Knuuti; Mikko Pietilä; Cezary Kępka; Mariusz Kruk; Radosav Vidakovic; Aleksandar N Neskovic; Ignacio Díez; Iñigo Lecumberri; Jacob Geleijns; Christine Kubiak; Anke Strenge-Hesse; The-Hoang Do; Felix Frömel; Iñaki Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea; Gaizka Benguria-Arrate; Hans Keiding; Christoph Katzer; Jacqueline Müller-Nordhorn; Nina Rieckmann; Mario Walther; Peter Schlattmann; Marc Dewey
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Subclinical coronary atherosclerosis in young adults: prevalence, characteristics, predictors with coronary computed tomography angiography.

Authors:  Kwang Nam Jin; Eun Ju Chun; Chang-Hoon Lee; Jeong A Kim; Min Su Lee; Sang Il Choi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Asymptomatic subjects with zero coronary calcium score: coronary CT angiographic features of plaques in event-prone patients.

Authors:  Min Su Lee; Eun Ju Chun; Kil Joong Kim; Jeong A Kim; Jin Young Yoo; Sang Il Choi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Reliability of the McSweeney Acute and Prodromal Myocardial Infarction Symptom Survey among black and white women.

Authors:  Jean C McSweeney; Mario A Cleves; Ellen P Fischer; Martha O Rojo; Narain Armbya; Debra K Moser
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 3.908

10.  Insight into the Spectrum of Coronary Atherosclerosis in Asymptomatic Urban Han Chinese Population by Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography.

Authors:  Jiangbing Li; Ruihong Liu; Xiaokang Ji; Hao Xue; Guang Zhang; Chunxia Wang; Qicai Chen; Fuzhong Xue; Lianqun Cui
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.