Literature DB >> 12821492

In vitro activities of ramoplanin, teicoplanin, vancomycin, linezolid, bacitracin, and four other antimicrobials against intestinal anaerobic bacteria.

D M Citron1, C V Merriam, K L Tyrrell, Y A Warren, H Fernandez, E J C Goldstein.   

Abstract

By using an agar dilution method, the in vitro activities of ramoplanin, teicoplanin, vancomycin, linezolid, and five other agents were determined against 300 gram-positive and 54 gram-negative strains of intestinal anaerobes. Ramoplanin was active at <or=2 microg/ml against 287 of 300 (95.7%) gram-positive organisms, including 18 strains of Clostridium difficile for which MICs of ramoplanin were 0.25 to 0.5 microg/ml; for 3 of these, linezolid MICs were 8 to 16 micro g/ml. Nineteen Clostridium innocuum strains for which the vancomycin MIC at which 90% of strains were inhibited was 16 microg/ml were susceptible to ramoplanin at 0.06 to 0.25 microg/ml and to teicoplanin at 0.125 to 1.0 microg/ml. All strains of Eubacterium, Actinomyces, Propionibacterium, and Peptostreptococcus spp. were inhibited by <or=0.25 microg of ramoplanin per ml and <or=1 microg of vancomycin per ml. Ramoplanin was also active at <or=4 microg/ml against 15 of 22 of the Prevotella and Porphyromonas strains tested, but ramoplanin MICs for all 31 strains of the Bacteroides fragilis group, the Fusobacterium mortiferum-Fusobacterium varium group, and Veillonella spp. were >or=256 microg/ml. Ramoplanin displays excellent activity against C. difficile and other gram-positive enteric anaerobes, including vancomycin-resistant strains; however, it has poor activity against most gram-negative anaerobes and thus potentially has a lesser effect on the ecological balance of normal fecal flora.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12821492      PMCID: PMC161871          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.7.2334-2338.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  17 in total

1.  In-vitro activity of 29 antimicrobial agents against penicillin-resistant and -intermediate isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Authors:  O Manzor; J Pawlak; L Saravolatz
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Effect of antibiotic therapy on the density of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in the stool of colonized patients.

Authors:  C J Donskey; T K Chowdhry; M T Hecker; C K Hoyen; J A Hanrahan; A M Hujer; R A Hutton-Thomas; C C Whalen; R A Bonomo; L B Rice
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-12-28       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Yield of vancomycin-resistant enterococci and multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae from stools submitted for Clostridium difficile testing compared to results from a focused surveillance program.

Authors:  D M Hacek; P Bednarz; G A Noskin; T Zembower; L R Peterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  In vitro evaluation of ramoplanin (A16686 or MDL62198). A new depsipeptide complex for potential topical use.

Authors:  R N Jones; A L Barry
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.803

5.  In-vitro studies with ramoplanin (MDL 62,198): a novel lipoglycopeptide antimicrobial.

Authors:  M D O'Hare; G Ghosh; D Felmingham; R N Grüneberg
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Effective suppression of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus species in asymptomatic gastrointestinal carriers by a novel glycolipodepsipeptide, ramoplanin.

Authors:  M T Wong; C A Kauffman; H C Standiford; P Linden; G Fort; H J Fuchs; S B Porter; R P Wenzel
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2001-10-04       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  In vitro activities of ramoplanin, selected glycopeptides, fluoroquinolones, and other antibiotics against clinical bloodstream isolates of gram-positive cocci.

Authors:  T Lawrence; C Rotstein; T R Beam; E A Gorzynski; D Amsterdam
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Inhibition of peptidoglycan biosynthesis by ramoplanin.

Authors:  E A Somner; P E Reynolds
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  In vitro activities of ramoplanin and four glycopeptide antibiotics against clinical isolates of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  F Biavasco; E Manso; P E Varaldo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Antecedent treatment with different antibiotic agents as a risk factor for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus.

Authors:  Yehuda Carmeli; George M Eliopoulos; Matthew H Samore
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  Clostridium difficile infection: update on emerging antibiotic treatment options and antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  Dhara Shah; Minh-Duc Dang; Rodrigo Hasbun; Hoonmo L Koo; Zhi-Dong Jiang; Herbert L DuPont; Kevin W Garey
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 2.  Future novel therapeutic agents for Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Hoonmo L Koo; Kevin W Garey; Herbert L Dupont
Journal:  Expert Opin Investig Drugs       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 6.206

3.  In vitro activities of daptomycin, vancomycin, and penicillin against Clostridium difficile, C. perfringens, Finegoldia magna, and Propionibacterium acnes.

Authors:  Kerin L Tyrrell; Diane M Citron; Yumi A Warren; Helen T Fernandez; C Vreni Merriam; Ellie J C Goldstein
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Additional congeners of the macrolide neaumycin: structure revision and biological activity.

Authors:  Matteo Simone; Sonia I Maffioli; Arianna Tocchetti; Stefano Tretter; Monica Cattaneo; Ida Biunno; Eleonora Gaspari; Stefano Donadio
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  In Vitro Activity of Tedizolid Compared to Linezolid and Five Other Antimicrobial Agents against 332 Anaerobic Isolates, Including Bacteroides fragilis Group, Prevotella, Porphyromonas, and Veillonella Species.

Authors:  Ellie J C Goldstein; C Vreni Merriam; Diane M Citron
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Four cases of bacteremia caused by Oscillibacter ruminantium, a newly described species.

Authors:  Thomas V Sydenham; Magnus Arpi; Kasper Klein; Ulrik S Justesen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  In vitro activity of ramoplanin against Clostridium difficile, including strains with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin or with resistance to metronidazole.

Authors:  T Peláez; L Alcalá; R Alonso; A Martín-López; V García-Arias; M Marín; E Bouza
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Pharmacological properties of NAI-603, a well-tolerated semisynthetic derivative of ramoplanin.

Authors:  Daniela Jabes; Cristina Brunati; GianPaolo Candiani; Simona Riva; Gabriella Romanó; Sonia Maffioli; Rosaria Rossi; Matteo Simone; Eleonora Gaspari; Stefano Donadio
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  New antimicrobial agents for patients with Clostridium difficile infections.

Authors:  John G Bartlett
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.725

10.  New advances in the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI).

Authors:  Dennis D Hedge; Joe D Strain; Jodi R Heins; Debra K Farver
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.