Literature DB >> 12821219

Assessment of myocardial perfusion in patients with coronary artery disease. Comparison of myocardial contrast echocardiography and 99mTc MIBI single photon emission computed tomography.

Maria Olszowska1, Magdalena Kostkiewicz, Wieslawa Tracz, Tadeusz Przewlocki.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Myocardial perfusion (MP) can be assessed in real time when using a low mechanical index (MI) and harmonic imaging following an intravenous injection of contrast agent. The aim of the study was to determine the feasibility and accuracy of the real-time imaging of contrast echocardiography (MCE) for detecting myocardial perfusion defects at rest and during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DE) compared with 99m Tc MIBI SPECT. The study group consisted of 44 patients (24 men, 20 women, mean age 58.9+/-7.8) with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). All patients underwent DE. Wall motion (WM) and segmental perfusion were estimated in real time before and at peak stress using a low MI (0.4) after 0.3 ml bolus injections of intravenous Optison. All patients underwent a rest and exercise 99mTc MIBI SPECT study (SPECT). A 16-segment model of the left ventricle was used for the analysis of MP, WM and SPECT by a blinded reviewer. All patients underwent coronary angiography. Significant coronary artery disease was defined as >60% luminal diameter stenosis.
RESULTS: All patients had significant CAD. Twenty-nine patients had single-vessel and 15 patients had double-vessel disease. For all patients, agreement between MCE and SPECT was 89%, between MCE and WM -86%, and between SPECT and WM -82%. The agreement between MCE and SPECT for LAD, RCA and Cx territories was 81, 91 and 73%, respectively. The sensitivity of MCE and SPECT for detecting perfusion defects due to significant CAD (confirmed angiographically) was 97% and 93%, respectively, and the specificity was 93 and 84%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: MCE in real-time imaging with Optison has significant potential for the identification of MP abnormalities. MCE correlates very well with SPECT images.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12821219     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-5273(02)00475-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  7 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic and prognostic value of non-invasive imaging in known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  J D Schuijf; D Poldermans; L J Shaw; J W Jukema; H J Lamb; A de Roos; W Wijns; E E van der Wall; J J Bax
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Cardiac imaging in coronary artery disease: differing modalities.

Authors:  J D Schuijf; L J Shaw; W Wijns; H J Lamb; D Poldermans; A de Roos; E E van der Wall; J J Bax
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Detection of coronary artery disease using real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography: a comparison with dual-isotope resting thallium-201/stress technectium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography.

Authors:  Shoa-Lin Lin; Kuan-Rau Chiou; Wei-Chun Huang; Nan-Jing Peng; Daw-Guey Tsay; Chun-Peng Liu
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 4.  Assessment of myocardial ischemia and viability using cardiac magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Javier Sanz; Teresa Rius; Paola Kuschnir; Rafael Salguero Bodes; Michael Poon
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Quantitative detection of myocardial ischaemia by stress echocardiography; a comparison with SPECT.

Authors:  Petri Gudmundsson; Kambiz Shahgaldi; Reidar Winter; Magnus Dencker; Mariusz Kitlinski; Ola Thorsson; Ronnie B Willenheimer; Lennart Ljunggren
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 2.062

6.  Head to head comparisons of two modalities of perfusion adenosine stress echocardiography with simultaneous SPECT.

Authors:  Petri Gudmundsson; Kambiz Shahgaldi; Reidar Winter; Magnus Dencker; Mariusz Kitlinski; Ola Thorsson; Lennart Ljunggren; Ronnie B Willenheimer
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 2.062

Review 7.  Combination of contrast with stress echocardiography: a practical guide to methods and interpretation.

Authors:  Stuart Moir; Thomas H Marwick
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2004-08-26       Impact factor: 2.062

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.