BACKGROUND: Heat stress in early pregnancy is known to have a teratogenic effect. Exercise produces excess heat and during pregnancy might therefore present a theoretical risk of malformations. Our aim was to assess the thermal response to exercise of healthy pregnant women in a longitudinal study. METHODS: Fourteen women were examined before pregnancy, and followed five times during, and twice after pregnancy, using a submaximal bicycle test with a target heart rate of 85% of the predicted age-adjusted maximum. The main aim was to present reference values. RESULTS: The temperature at submaximal work load declined continuously from preconception to postpartum levels (37.8 degrees C vs. 36.9 degrees C, p = 0.04). The difference between peak and basal core temperature fell from 0.6 degrees C to 0.05 degrees C at 29 and 36 weeks of gestation, reaching preconception levels at 24 weeks after delivery (0.8 degrees C lower). CONCLUSION: During submaximal exercise the temperature response seemed to provide thermal protection for the embryo and the fetus.
BACKGROUND: Heat stress in early pregnancy is known to have a teratogenic effect. Exercise produces excess heat and during pregnancy might therefore present a theoretical risk of malformations. Our aim was to assess the thermal response to exercise of healthy pregnant women in a longitudinal study. METHODS: Fourteen women were examined before pregnancy, and followed five times during, and twice after pregnancy, using a submaximal bicycle test with a target heart rate of 85% of the predicted age-adjusted maximum. The main aim was to present reference values. RESULTS: The temperature at submaximal work load declined continuously from preconception to postpartum levels (37.8 degrees C vs. 36.9 degrees C, p = 0.04). The difference between peak and basal core temperature fell from 0.6 degrees C to 0.05 degrees C at 29 and 36 weeks of gestation, reaching preconception levels at 24 weeks after delivery (0.8 degrees C lower). CONCLUSION: During submaximal exercise the temperature response seemed to provide thermal protection for the embryo and the fetus.
Authors: Anne Marie Z Jukic; Kelly R Evenson; Julie L Daniels; Amy H Herring; Allen J Wilcox; Katherine E Hartmann Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2012-07
Authors: Michelle F Mottola; Dana Vanderspank; Candice L Schachter; Jaci VanHeest; Robert M Tanguay Journal: Cell Stress Chaperones Date: 2007 Impact factor: 3.667
Authors: Louisa Samuels; Britt Nakstad; Nathalie Roos; Ana Bonell; Matthew Chersich; George Havenith; Stanley Luchters; Louise-Tina Day; Jane E Hirst; Tanya Singh; Kirsty Elliott-Sale; Robyn Hetem; Cherie Part; Shobna Sawry; Jean Le Roux; Sari Kovats Journal: Int J Biometeorol Date: 2022-05-12 Impact factor: 3.738
Authors: Olga Roldan Reoyo; Jose Castro-Piñero; Lidia Romero-Gallardo; Linda E May; Olga Ocón-Hernández; Michelle F Mottola; Virginia A Aparicio; Alberto Soriano-Maldonado Journal: BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Date: 2022-09-23
Authors: Erica P Baciuk; Rosa I Pereira; Jose G Cecatti; Angelica F Braga; Sergio R Cavalcante Journal: Reprod Health Date: 2008-11-21 Impact factor: 3.223