Literature DB >> 12820740

Surgical management of patients in the REMATCH trial.

Wayne E Richenbacher1, Yoshifumi Naka, Edward P Raines, O H Frazier, Gregory S Couper, Francis D Pagani, Laura Damme, Clifford H VanMeter, George J Magovern, Lopa Gupta, Sarah C Seemuth, Alan D Weinberg, James W Long.   

Abstract

The donor shortage makes cardiac transplantation a less than ideal treatment for end-stage heart failure. The utility of the left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as a permanent form of circulatory support has recently been established in the REMATCH (Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure) trial. In this report, we describe the surgical management of LVAD patients in REMATCH and their short-term outcomes. Between 1998 and 2001, 129 patients with end-stage heart failure, who were excluded from consideration for transplantation, were enrolled in the REMATCH clinical trial. Patients were randomized to two treatment arms: optimal medical management or HeartMate vented electric LVAD implantation. The primary end point of the study was death from any cause. Secondary end points included the incidence of serious adverse events, the duration of hospitalization, quality of life, and functional status. Sixty-eight patients received an LVAD, 55 (81%) of whom survived for longer than 1 month. The median intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay (LOS) for those that survived at least 1 month were 15 and 34 days, respectively. Sixty-seven (99%) patients had a serious adverse event. The rates of perioperative bleeding, late bleeding, right heart failure, and sepsis were 0.42, 0.53, 0.15, and 0.53 events/patient-year, respectively. Factors predictive of a longer LOS for the implant hospitalization included sepsis, age, and late bleeding (p < 0.0001). The patients' New York Heart Association functional class improved significantly at 1 month compared with base line (p < 0.001). Functional class improved in LVAD-supported patients despite a high adverse event rate. Most adverse events occurred within 30 days of device implantation. Sepsis, age, and late bleeding were the major determinants of LOS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12820740     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(03)00485-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  8 in total

1.  Japanese multicenter clinical evaluation of the HeartMate vented electric left ventricular assist system.

Authors:  Ryozo Omoto; Shunei Kyo; Motonobu Nishimura; Hikaru Matsuda; Goro Matsumiya; Soichiro Kitamura; Takeshi Nakatani; Shinichi Takamoto; Mdminoru Ono; Koichi Tabayashi; Ryohei Yozu
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.731

2.  Effects of continuous-flow versus pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist devices on myocardial unloading and remodeling.

Authors:  Tomoko S Kato; Aalap Chokshi; Parvati Singh; Tuba Khawaja; Faisal Cheema; Hirokazu Akashi; Khurram Shahzad; Shinichi Iwata; Shunichi Homma; Hiroo Takayama; Yoshifumi Naka; Ulrich Jorde; Maryjane Farr; Donna M Mancini; P Christian Schulze
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 8.790

Review 3.  Posterior ventricular restoration treatment for heart failure: a review, past, present and future aspects.

Authors:  Tadashi Isomura; Yasuhisa Fukada; Takuya Miyazaki; Minoru Yoshida; Akimasa Morisaki; Masahiro Endo
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-02-04

4.  Implementation of an intensified outpatient follow-up protocol improves outcomes in patients with ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Sonja Hamed; Bastian Schmack; Florian Mueller; Philipp Ehlermann; Davina Hittmann; Arjang Ruhparwar; Hugo A Katus; Philip W Raake; Michael M Kreusser
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-03-16       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  Use of plasma late on cardiopulmonary bypass in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  James A Nelson; Juan C Diaz Soto; Matthew A Warner; John M Stulak; Phillip J Schulte; Timothy J Weister; William J Mauermann; Mark M Smith
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 2.663

6.  Incidence and patterns of adverse event onset during the first 60 days after ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Genovese; Mary Amanda Dew; Jeffrey J Teuteberg; Marc A Simon; Joy Kay; Michael P Siegenthaler; Jay K Bhama; Christian A Bermudez; Kathleen L Lockard; Steve Winowich; Robert L Kormos
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Initial experience with off-pump left ventricular assist device implantation in single center: retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Hamdy Awad; Mohamed Abd El Dayem; Jarrett Heard; Galina Dimitrova; Lianbo Yu; Benjamin C Sun
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 1.637

8.  Past and present of cardiocirculatory assist devices: a comprehensive critical review.

Authors:  Gianluca Rigatelli; Francesco Santini; Giuseppe Faggian
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.327

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.