Literature DB >> 12820736

Interactions between the recipient immune system and the left ventricular assist device surface: immunological and clinical implications.

Silviu Itescu1, Ranjit John.   

Abstract

The unquestionable clinical success of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation has, nevertheless, been accompanied by complications arising from interactions between the implanted biomaterial and the host immune system. The aberrant state of monocyte and T-cell activation resulting from these host/device interactions is accompanied by two parallel processes: (1) selective loss of Th1 cytokine producing CD4 T-cells through activation-induced cell death; and (2) unopposed activation of Th2 cytokine producing CD4 T-cells resulting in B-cell hyperreactivity and dysregulated immunoglobulin synthesis through Th2 cytokines and heightened CD40 ligand-CD40 interactions. The net results of these events is that, on the one hand, the LVAD recipient develops progressive defects in cellular immunity and is at increased risk of serious infection, and, on the other hand, is more likely to develop allosensitization, posing a significant risk to successful transplant outcome. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy is an effective and safe modality for sensitized LVAD recipients awaiting cardiac transplantation, reducing serum anti-human lymphoicyte antigen (HLA) alloreactivity and shortening the duration to transplantation. The therapeutic and safety profile of intravenous immunoglobulin would appear to be superior to plasmapheresis. Immunosuppression incorporating intravenous cyclophosphamide before and after transplantation is safe and highly effective in sensitized LVAD recipients of cardiac transplantation. When used after transplantation as part of triple immunosuppressive regimens, cyclophosphamide is superior to mycophenolate mofetil in reducing episodes of allograft rejection in these patients. Because these immune dysfunctions appear to be related to the effects of excessive biomaterial-associated T-cell activation, future efforts will need to be directed at either altering the physical properties of the materials interacting with the host circulation or pharmacological intervention aimed more selectively at inhibiting T-cell activation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12820736     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(03)00480-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  16 in total

Review 1.  Electrical and mechanical stimulation of cardiac cells and tissue constructs.

Authors:  Whitney L Stoppel; David L Kaplan; Lauren D Black
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 15.470

2.  Disseminated Cryptococcus neoformans infection in a left ventricular assist device recipient.

Authors:  Deeksha Jandhyala; Eugene M Tan; David Cook Stahr; Muhammad Rizwan Sohail
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2019-04-08

3.  Canadian Cardiovascular Society Consensus Conference update on cardiac transplantation 2008: Executive Summary.

Authors:  H Haddad; D Isaac; J F Legare; P Pflugfelder; P Hendry; M Chan; B Cantin; N Giannetti; S Zieroth; M White; W Warnica; K Doucette; V Rao; A Dipchand; M Cantarovich; W Kostuk; R Cecere; E Charbonneau; H Ross; N Poirier
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.223

4.  Cardiovascular implantable device infections.

Authors:  George M Viola; Rabih O Darouiche
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.725

5.  False positive hepatitis C antibody test results in left ventricular assist device recipients: increased risk with age and transfusions.

Authors:  Grace Y Minamoto; Doreen Lee; Adriana Colovai; Dana Levy; Ljiljana Vasovic; Keith W Roach; Jonathan Shuter; Daniel Goldstein; David D'Alessandro; Ulrich P Jorde; Victoria A Muggia
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Delayed febrile response with bloodstream infections in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Christopher A Wrobel; Mark H Drazner; Colby R Ayers; David D Pham; Ricardo M La Hoz; Justin L Grodin; Sonia Garg; Pradeep P A Mammen; Robert M Morlend; Faris Araj; Alpesh A Amin; William K Cornwell; Jennifer T Thibodeau
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Temporal expression of cytokines and B-cell phenotypes during mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  Amit Iyengar; Nicholas Wisniewski; Oh Jin Kwon; Martin Cadeiras; Mario Deng; Joanna Schaenman; Yael Korin; Richard Shemin; Elaine Reed; Murray Kwon
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Lymphocyte adhesion and interactions with biomaterial adherent macrophages and foreign body giant cells.

Authors:  David T Chang; Erica Colton; Takehisa Matsuda; James M Anderson
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 4.396

9.  Lack of significant de novo HLA allosensitization in ventricular assist device recipients transfused with leukoreduced, ABO identical blood products.

Authors:  Myra Coppage; Marc Baker; Lawrence Fialkow; Danielle Meehan; Kelly Gettings; Leway Chen; H Todd Massey; Neil Blumberg
Journal:  Hum Immunol       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 2.850

10.  Prior human leukocyte antigen-allosensitization and left ventricular assist device type affect degree of post-implantation human leukocyte antigen-allosensitization.

Authors:  Stavros G Drakos; Abdallah G Kfoury; John R Kotter; Bruce B Reid; Stephen E Clayson; Craig H Selzman; Josef Stehlik; Patrick W Fisher; Mario Merida; David D Eckels; Kim Brunisholz; Benjamin D Horne; Sandi Stoker; Dean Y Li; Dale G Renlund
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 10.247

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.