Literature DB >> 12820701

Differences between African Americans and Whites in their attitudes toward genetic testing for Alzheimer's disease.

Yvonne G Hipps1, J Scott Roberts, Lindsay A Farrer, Robert C Green.   

Abstract

The possibility of predictive genetic testing for Alzheimer's disease (AD) has prompted examination of public attitudes toward this controversial new health-care option. This is the first study to examine differences between Whites and African Americans with regard to: (1) interest in pursuing genetic testing for AD, (2) reasons for pursuing testing, (3) anticipated consequences of testing, and (4) beliefs about testing. We surveyed a convenience sample of 452 adults (61% white; 39% African American; 78% female; mean age = 47 years; 33% with family history of AD). Both racial groups indicated general interest in predictive genetic testing for AD, viewed it as having many potential benefits, and believed it should be offered with few restrictions. However, in comparison to whites, African Americans showed less interest in testing (p < 0.01), endorsed fewer reasons for pursuing it (p < 0.01), and anticipated fewer negative consequences from a positive test result (p < 0.001). These preliminary findings show important distinctions between whites and African Americans in their attitudes toward genetic testing for AD. These differences may have implications for how different racial and ethnic groups will respond to genetic testing programs and how such services should be designed. Future research in real-life testing situations with more representative samples will be necessary to confirm these racial and cultural differences in perceptions of genetic testing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12820701     DOI: 10.1089/109065703321560921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Test        ISSN: 1090-6576


  24 in total

1.  Racial and ethnic differences in direct-to-consumer genetic tests awareness in HINTS 2007: sociodemographic and numeracy correlates.

Authors:  Aisha T Langford; Ken Resnicow; J Scott Roberts; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Engaging African-Americans about biobanks and the return of research results.

Authors:  Colin Me Halverson; Lainie Friedman Ross
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-03-28

3.  Pharmacological treatment of Alzheimer's disease: effect of race and demographic variables.

Authors:  Santiago Hernandez; McKee J McClendon; Xiao-Hua Andrew Zhou; Michael Sachs; Alan J Lerner
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.472

4.  Community engagement about genetic variation research.

Authors:  Sharon F Terry; Kurt D Christensen; Susan Metosky; Gayle Rudofsky; Kathleen P Deignan; Hulda Martinez; Penelope Johnson-Moore; Toby Citrin
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 2.459

5.  Differences between African American and White research volunteers in their attitudes, beliefs and knowledge regarding genetic testing for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Ibidapo Akinleye; J Scott Roberts; Charmaine D M Royal; Erin Linnenbringer; Thomas O Obisesan; Grace-Ann Fasaye; Robert C Green
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Genetic susceptibility testing for chronic disease and intention for behavior change in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Jason L Vassy; Karen Donelan; Marie-France Hivert; Robert C Green; Richard W Grant
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-02-24

7.  Development and validation of the Alzheimer's prevention beliefs measure in a multi-ethnic cohort-a behavioral theory approach.

Authors:  Alon Seifan; Christine A Ganzer; Francoise Vermeylen; Stephen Parry; Jifeng Zhu; Abigail Lyons; Richard Isaacson; Sarang Kim
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.341

8.  Disclosure of APOE genotype for risk of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Robert C Green; J Scott Roberts; L Adrienne Cupples; Norman R Relkin; Peter J Whitehouse; Tamsen Brown; Susan LaRusse Eckert; Melissa Butson; A Dessa Sadovnick; Kimberly A Quaid; Clara Chen; Robert Cook-Deegan; Lindsay A Farrer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Ethnic differences in parental perceptions of genetic testing for deaf infants.

Authors:  Christina G S Palmer; Ariadna Martinez; Michelle Fox; Yvonne Sininger; Wayne W Grody; Lisa A Schimmenti
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-10-19       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Memantine and acetylcholinesterase inhibitor treatment in cases of CDR 0.5 or questionable impairment.

Authors:  McKee J McClendon; Santiago Hernandez; Kathleen A Smyth; Alan J Lerner
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.472

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.