Literature DB >> 1282024

Isolation and cultivation of blastocyst-derived stem cell lines from American mink (Mustela vison).

M A Sukoyan1, A N Golubitsa, A I Zhelezova, A G Shilov, S Y Vatolin, L P Maximovsky, L E Andreeva, J McWhir, S D Pack, S I Bayborodin.   

Abstract

Ten embryonic stem (ES) cell lines from mink blastocysts were isolated and characterized. All the lines had a normal diploid karyotype; of the ten lines studied, five had the XX and five had the XY constitution. Testing of the pluripotency of the ES-like cells demonstrated that 1) among four lines of genotype XX, and X was late-replicating in three; both Xs were active in about one-third of cells of line MES8, and analysis of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase revealed no dosage compensation for the X-linked gene; 2) when cultured in suspension, the majority of lines were capable of forming "simple" embryoid bodies (EB), and two only showed the capacity for forming "cystic" multilayer EBs. However, formation of ectoderm or foci of yolk sac hematopoiesis, a feature of mouse ES cells, was not observed in the "cystic" EB; 3) when cultured as a monolayer without feeder, the ES cells differentiated into either vimentin-positive fibroblast-like cells or cytokeratin-positive epithelial-like cells (less frequently); neural cells appeared in two lines; 4) when injected into athymic mice, only one of the four tested lines gave rise to tumors. These were fibrosarcomas composed of fibroblast-like cells, with an admixture of smooth muscular elements and stray islets of epithelial tissue; (5) when the ES cells of line MES1 were injected into 102 blastocyst cavities and subsequently transplanted into foster mothers, we obtained 30 offspring. Analysis of the biochemical markers and coat color did not demonstrate the presence of chimaeras among offspring. Thus the cell lines derived from mink blastocysts are true ES cells. However, their pluripotential capacities are restricted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1282024     DOI: 10.1002/mrd.1080330408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev        ISSN: 1040-452X            Impact factor:   2.609


  8 in total

Review 1.  Current progress with primate embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  James A Byrne; Shoukhrat M Mitalipov; Don P Wolf
Journal:  Curr Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.828

2.  Development of a pluripotent ES-like cell line from Asian sea bass (Lates calcarifer)--an oviparous stem cell line mimicking viviparous ES cells.

Authors:  V Parameswaran; Ravi Shukla; Ramesh Bhonde; A S Sahul Hameed
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2007-08-18       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  Production of healthy cloned mice from bodies frozen at -20 degrees C for 16 years.

Authors:  Sayaka Wakayama; Hiroshi Ohta; Takafusa Hikichi; Eiji Mizutani; Takamasa Iwaki; Osami Kanagawa; Teruhiko Wakayama
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-11-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Transgenesis in rats: technical aspects and models.

Authors:  B Charreau; L Tesson; J P Soulillou; C Pourcel; I Anegon
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.788

5.  Production of medakafish chimeras from a stable embryonic stem cell line.

Authors:  Y Hong; C Winkler; M Schartl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-03-31       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Isolation of a primate embryonic stem cell line.

Authors:  J A Thomson; J Kalishman; T G Golos; M Durning; C P Harris; R A Becker; J P Hearn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Role of bioinspired polymers in determination of pluripotent stem cell fate.

Authors:  Sheena Abraham; Nikolai Eroshenko; Raj R Rao
Journal:  Regen Med       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.806

8.  Comparison of American mink embryonic stem and induced pluripotent stem cell transcriptomes.

Authors:  Aleksei G Menzorov; Natalia M Matveeva; Marios N Markakis; Venyamin S Fishman; Knud Christensen; Anna A Khabarova; Inna E Pristyazhnyuk; Elena A Kizilova; Susanna Cirera; Razvan Anistoroaei; Oleg L Serov
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 3.969

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.