Literature DB >> 12819933

The opportunities and challenges of personalized genome-based molecular therapies for cancer: targets, technologies, and molecular chaperones.

Paul Workman1.   

Abstract

There are now unprecedented opportunities for the development of improved drugs for cancer treatment. Following on from the Human Genome Project, the Cancer Genome Project and related activities will define most of the genes in the majority of common human cancers over the next 5 years. This will provide the opportunity to develop a range of drugs targeted to the precise molecular abnormalities that drive various human cancers and opens up the possibility of personalized therapies targeted to the molecular pathology and genomics of individual patients and their malignancies. The new molecular therapies should be more effective and have less-severe side effects than cytotoxic agents. To develop the new generation of molecular cancer therapeutics as rapidly as possible, it is essential to harness the power of a range of new technologies. These include: genomic and proteomic methodologies (particularly gene expression microarrays); robotic high-throughput screening of diverse compound collections, together with in silico and fragment-based screening techniques; new structural biology methods for rational drug design (especially high-throughput X-ray crystallography and nuclear magnetic resonance); and advanced chemical technologies, including combinatorial and parallel synthesis. Two major challenges to cancer drug discovery are: (1) the ability to convert potent and selective lead compounds with activity by the desired mechanism on tumor cells in culture into agents with robust, drug-like properties, particularly in terms of pharmacokinetic and metabolic properties; and (2) the development of validated pharmacodynamic endpoints and molecular markers of drug response, ideally using noninvasive imaging technologies. The use of various new technologies will be exemplified. A major conceptual and practical issue facing the development and use of the new molecular cancer therapeutics is whether a single drug that targets one of a series of key molecular abnormalities in a particular cancer (e.g. BRAF) will be sufficient on its own to deliver clinical benefit ("house of cards" and tumor addiction models). The alternative scenario is that it will require either a combination of agents or a class of drug that has downstream effects on a range of oncogenic targets. Inhibitors of the heat-shock protein (HSP) 90 molecular chaperone are of particular interest in the latter regard, because they offer the potential of inhibiting multiple oncogenic pathways and simultaneous blockade of all six "hallmark traits" of cancer through direct interaction with a single molecular drug target. The first-in-class HSP90 inhibitor 17AAG exhibited good activity in animal models and is now showing evidence of molecular and clinical activity in ongoing clinical trials. Novel HSP90 inhibitors are also being sought. The development of HSP90 inhibitors is used to exemplify the application of new technologies in drug discovery against a novel molecular target, and in particular the need for innovative pharmacodynamic endpoints is emphasized as an essential component of hypothesis-testing clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12819933     DOI: 10.1007/s00280-003-0593-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  8 in total

Review 1.  Neurooncology clinical trial design for targeted therapies: lessons learned from the North American Brain Tumor Consortium.

Authors:  Susan M Chang; Kathleen R Lamborn; John G Kuhn; W K Alfred Yung; Mark R Gilbert; Patrick Y Wen; Howard A Fine; Minesh P Mehta; Lisa M DeAngelis; Frank S Lieberman; Timothy F Cloughesy; H Ian Robins; Lauren E Abrey; Michael D Prados
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 2.  Toward precision medicine of breast cancer.

Authors:  Nicolas Carels; Lizânia Borges Spinassé; Tatiana Martins Tilli; Jack Adam Tuszynski
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 2.432

3.  The development of lonidamine for benign prostatic hyperplasia and other indications.

Authors:  Claus G Roehrborn
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

4.  MET activation mediates resistance to lapatinib inhibition of HER2-amplified gastric cancer cells.

Authors:  Chin-Tung Chen; Hyaehwan Kim; David Liska; Sizhi Gao; James G Christensen; Martin R Weiser
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 6.261

5.  Extracellular heat shock protein-90alpha: linking hypoxia to skin cell motility and wound healing.

Authors:  Wei Li; Yong Li; Shengxi Guan; Jianhua Fan; Chieh-Fang Cheng; Alexandra M Bright; Cindi Chinn; Mei Chen; David T Woodley
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Comparative Effectiveness of Biomarkers to Target Cancer Treatment: Modeling Implications for Survival and Costs.

Authors:  Jeanette K Birnbaum; Foluso O Ademuyiwa; Josh J Carlson; Leslie Mallinger; Mark W Mason; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Genotype and allele frequency of human multidrug resistance (MDR1) gene C3435T polymorphism in Denizli province of Turkey.

Authors:  Sebahat Turgut; Günfer Turgut; Erol Omer Atalay
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2006-11-02       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 8.  Guidelines for preclinical and early phase clinical assessment of novel radiosensitisers.

Authors:  K J Harrington; L J Billingham; T B Brunner; N G Burnet; C S Chan; P Hoskin; R I Mackay; T S Maughan; J Macdougall; W G McKenna; C M Nutting; A Oliver; R Plummer; I J Stratford; T Illidge
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 7.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.