Literature DB >> 12819888

[Temporary articulating spacer with antibiotic-impregnated cement for an infected knee endoprosthesis].

M Pietsch1, C Wenisch, S Traussnig, R Trnoska, S Hofmann.   

Abstract

Two-stage reimplantation remains the gold standard in the treatment of late infected total knee arthroplasties. The reported disadvantages include difficult exposure at the time of reimplantation and less functional outcome by using static spacers. Patients who receive an articulating spacer retain a functional joint before second-stage reimplantation. This may reduce the disadvantages of static spacers (ligament contracture, extensor lag, arthrofibrosis). There is no difference in the success rates of eradicating infection (range: 90-96%). In a prospective study 24 consecutive patients were treated with an articulating spacer. The articulating spacer is made by cleaning and autoclaving the removed femoral component and the tibial polyethylene insert. These are reinserted during the same operation with antibiotic-loaded cement. The average time during which the spacer was in place was 16 weeks (range: 7-28 weeks). During an average follow-up period of 14.8 months (range: 5-33 months) one patient had a secondary reinfection. Use of an articulating spacer is economical and decreases the risk of complications in reimplantation with good functional outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12819888     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-003-0478-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  6 in total

Review 1.  Two-stage revision of septic knee prosthesis with articulating knee spacers yields better infection eradication rate than one-stage or two-stage revision with static spacers.

Authors:  C L Romanò; L Gala; N Logoluso; D Romanò; L Drago
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  [Replacement of infected knee and hip endoprostheses].

Authors:  M Militz; V Bühren
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  [Treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty. 2-5-year results following two-stage reimplantation].

Authors:  M Pietsch; C Wenisch; S Hofmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  Outcome of prosthesis exchange for infected knee arthroplasty: the effect of treatment approach.

Authors:  Esa Jämsen; Ioannis Stogiannidis; Antti Malmivaara; Jorma Pajamäki; Timo Puolakka; Yrjö T Konttinen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Periprosthetic joint infection: Current concept.

Authors:  Vinay K Aggarwal; Mohammad R Rasouli; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.251

6.  Antibiotic Spacers in Shoulder Arthroplasty: Comparison of Stemmed and Stemless Implants.

Authors:  Eric M Padegimas; Alexia Narzikul; Cassandra Lawrence; Benjamin A Hendy; Joseph A Abboud; Matthew L Ramsey; Gerald R Williams; Surena Namdari
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2017-11-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.