Literature DB >> 12819884

[Significance of axial rotation alignment of components of knee prostheses].

J Romero1, T Stähelin, T Wyss, S Hofmann.   

Abstract

Increased internal malrotation of the tibial and femoral components affects kinematics of the patellofemoral joint and the flexion gap. A combined tibial and femoral malrotation may lead to maltracking of the patella. Isolated internal malrotation of the femoral component results in an asymmetric flexion gap. Clinically, the patients suffer from either lateral instability or medial stiffness in flexion. Lateral flexion instability leads to medial tibial pain,difficulties standing up from a chair,or instability during descending stairs or walking downhill. Medial stiffness in flexion may lead to secondary arthrofibrosis. There are three methods for determining femoral rotation by bony landmarks: (1) posterior condyles with 3 degrees of external rotation, (2) anterior-posterior axis according to Whiteside, and (3) transepicondylar axis. The transepicondylar axis approximates the flexion axis of the knee. All three bony landmarks have the disadvantage that they will not create a symmetric flexion gap in all cases. The balanced flexion gap technique seeks to achieve a perfectly balanced extension gap first, and then aligns the femoral component parallel to the tibial resection plane when the knee is under symmetric distraction in 90 degrees of flexion. The soft tissue releases for varus or valgus contraction have to be performed in extension first until the mechanical axis passes through the center of the knee, the center of the femoral head, and the center of the ankle. Using these methods, both,extension and flexion gap will become rectangular. The balanced flexion gap method has the disadvantage that the femoral component will not be aligned parallel to the epicondylar axis in some cases. It is not known which of the two methods will produce better clinical results. Rotational positioning of the tibial component referenced on the tibial tuberosity represents the most reliable method. Placing the tibial component according to the femoral component using the floating technique may increase an internal malrotation problem of the femur if present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12819884     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-003-0475-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  19 in total

1.  Early revision for isolated internal malrotation of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Martin Pietsch; Siegfried Hofmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Is it possible to re-establish pre-operative patellar kinematics using a ligament-balanced technique in total knee arthroplasty? A cadaveric investigation.

Authors:  Armin Keshmiri; Hans Springorum; Clemens Baier; Florian Zeman; Joachim Grifka; Günther Maderbacher
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  [Value of radiographic examination of the knee joint for the orthopedic surgeon].

Authors:  M Pietsch; S Hofmann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  [Navigator concept. Optimizing the procedure for navigated total knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  H Windhagen; F Thorey; S Ostermeier; J Emmerich; C J Wirth; C Stukenborg-Colsman
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  [Variance of identification of femoral epicondyles in navigated total knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  G Matziolis; D Krocker; S Tohtz; C Perka
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Rotational alignment of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty: the anterior tibial cortex is a reliable landmark.

Authors:  Andrea Baldini; Pier Francesco Indelli; Lapo DE Luca; Pierpaolo Cerulli Mariani; Massimiliano Marcucci
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2014-03-21

7.  A novel standardized algorithm for evaluating patients with painful total knee arthroplasty using combined single photon emission tomography and conventional computerized tomography.

Authors:  Michael T Hirschmann; Farhad Iranpour; Praveen Konala; Anna Kerner; Helmut Rasch; Justin P Cobb; Niklaus F Friederich
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  The anterior surface of the femur as a new landmark for femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Simon Talbot; John Bartlett
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Rotational alignment of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty is better at the medial third of tibial tuberosity than at the medial border.

Authors:  Jörg Lützner; Frank Krummenauer; Klaus-Peter Günther; Stephan Kirschner
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Anterior knee pain after a total knee arthroplasty: What can cause this pain?

Authors:  Stéfanus Jacob Martinus Breugem; Daniël Haverkamp
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-07-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.