Literature DB >> 12818598

Stability consideration for internal maxillary distractors.

Lim K Cheung1, Qian Zhang, Martin C M Wong, Lisa L S Wong.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Stability in distractor design ensures distraction osteogenesis healing with good bone regenerate formation. The aim of this study was to compare the holding strengths of different fixation systems for maxillary distractor design on bone pieces of different thicknesses.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional images of 10 dry skulls were obtained by computer tomography and the bone thickness of the maxillae were measured according to five individual anatomical regions (paranasal, infra-orbital, posterior sinus wall, zygomatic and alveolar regions). According to the measurements, the screws of 1.5 and 2mm in diameter and the three-screw mini-plates in triangular and straight configurations were evaluated for holding strength by pull-out tests on fresh animal bone pieces of defined thickness.
RESULTS: The paranasal and zygomatic regions of the human skulls had the thickest cortical bone (4mm) followed by the alveolar region (2mm). In the bones of 2 and 4mm thickness, the 2mm screws were confirmed stronger than the 1.5mm ones in pull-out tests. However, the pull-out behaviour of screws of different diameters in 1mm thick bones and the mini-plates in two different configurations showed no significant differences.
CONCLUSION: This study confirms that the paranasal and zygomatic bones are the thickest for fixation of internal maxillary distractors. Fixation screws of 2mm diameter in either triangular or straight miniplates can produce good stabilization for distractors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12818598     DOI: 10.1016/s1010-5182(03)00005-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  3 in total

1.  The thickness and the lengths of the anterior wall of adult maxilla of the West Anatolian Turkish people.

Authors:  Candan Arman; Ipek Ergür; Atay Atabey; Mustafa Güvencer; Amac Kiray; Esin Korman; Suleyman Tetik
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Parametric analysis of orthopedic screws in relation to bone density.

Authors:  Elisabetta M Zanetti; Massimiliano Salaorno; Giovanni Grasso; Alberto L Audenino
Journal:  Open Med Inform J       Date:  2009-04-21

3.  Treatment of maxillary cleft palate: Distraction osteogenesis vs. orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Adi Rachmiel; Michal Even-Almos; Dror Aizenbud
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.