Literature DB >> 12817511

Effects of bacterial direct-fed microbials and yeast on site and extent of digestion, blood chemistry, and subclinical ruminal acidosis in feedlot cattle.

K A Beauchemin1, W Z Yang, D P Morgavi, G R Ghorbani, W Kautz, J A Z Leedle.   

Abstract

Two studies were conducted to determine whether a bacterial direct-fed microbial (DFM) alone or with yeast could minimize the risk of acidosis and improve feed utilization in feedlot cattle receiving high-concentrate diets. Eight ruminally cannulated steers, previously adapted to a high-concentrate diet, were used in crossover designs to study the effects of DFM on feed intake, ruminal pH, ruminal fermentation, blood characteristics, site and extent of digestion, and microbial protein synthesis. Steers were provided ad libitum access to a diet containing steam-rolled barley, barley silage, and a protein-mineral supplement (87, 8, and 5% on a DM basis, respectively). In Exp. 1, treatments were control vs. the lactic-acid producing bacterium Enterococcus faecium EF212 (EF; 6 x 10(9) cfu/d). In Exp. 2, treatments were control vs EF (6 x 10(9) cfu/d) and yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae; 6 x 10(9) cfu/d). Supplementing feedlot cattle diets with EF in Exp. 1 increased (P < 0.05) propionate and (P < 0.05) decreased butyrate concentrations, decreased the nadir of ruminal pH (P < 0.05), enhanced the flow of feed N (P < 0.10) to the duodenum but reduced that of microbial N (P < 0.10), reduced (P < 0.10) intestinal digestion of NDF, and increased (P < 0.10) fecal coliform numbers. Other than the increase in propionate concentrations that signify an increase in energy precursors for growth, the other metabolic changes were generally considered to be undesirable. In Exp. 2, providing EF together with yeast abolished most of these undesirable effects. Combining EF with yeast increased the DM digestion of corn grain incubated in sacco, but there were no effects on altering the site or extent of nutrient digestion. The diets used in this study were highly fermentable, and the incidence of subclinical ruminal acidosis, defined as steers with ruminal pH below 5.5 for prolonged periods of time, was high. Supplementing the diet with EF, with or without yeast, had limited effects on reducing ruminal acidosis. It seems that cattle adapted to high-grain diets are able to maintain relatively high feed intake and high fiber digestion despite low ruminal pH. The Enterococcus faecium bacterium and yeast used in this study were of limited value for feedlot cattle already adapted to high-grain diets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12817511     DOI: 10.2527/2003.8161628x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  17 in total

1.  Influence of grain processing on acid-base balance in feedlot steers.

Authors:  C Castillo; J Hernández; J Méndez; J Llena; V Pereira; M López-Alonso; J L Benedito
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.459

2.  Effects of a blend of Saccharomyces cerevisiae-based direct-fed microbial and fermentation products in the diet of newly weaned beef steers: growth performance, whole-blood immune gene expression, serum biochemistry, and plasma metabolome1.

Authors:  James A Adeyemi; David L Harmon; D M Paulus Compart; Ibukun M Ogunade
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Use of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes and probiotic in finely ground starters to improve calf performance.

Authors:  A R Khademi; F Hashemzadeh; M Khorvash; A H Mahdavi; A Pazoki; M H Ghaffari
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Comparative effects of two multispecies direct-fed microbial products on energy status, nutrient digestibility, and ruminal fermentation, bacterial community, and metabolome of beef steers.

Authors:  Ibukun M Ogunade; Megan McCoun; Modoluwamu D Idowu; Sunday O Peters
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Using ruminally protected and nonprotected active dried yeast as alternatives to antibiotics in finishing beef steers: growth performance, carcass traits, blood metabolites, and fecal Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Tao Ran; Yizhao Z Shen; Atef M Saleem; Ousama AlZahal; Karen A Beauchemin; Wenzhu Z Yang
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  The use of live yeast to increase intake and performance of cattle receiving low-quality tropical forages.

Authors:  Mariano C Parra; Diogo F A Costa; Andre S V Palma; Karine D V Camargo; Lais O Lima; Karen J Harper; Sarah J Meale; Luis F P Silva
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Rumen microbial and fermentation characteristics are affected differently by bacterial probiotic supplementation during induced lactic and subacute acidosis in sheep.

Authors:  Abderzak Lettat; Pierre Nozière; Mathieu Silberberg; Diego P Morgavi; Claudette Berger; Cécile Martin
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 3.605

8.  Effect of yeast products supplementation during transition period on metabolic profile and milk production in dairy cows.

Authors:  Claudia Faccio-Demarco; Tatiele Mumbach; Vanessa Oliveira-de-Freitas; Raquel Fraga E Silva-Raimondo; Fernanda Medeiros-Gonçalves; Marcio Nunes-Corrêa; Francisco Augusto Burkert-Del Pino; Henrique Mendonça-Nunes-Ribeiro Filho; Cássio Cassal-Brauner
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 1.893

9.  Influence of Feeding Enzymatically Hydrolyzed Yeast Cell Wall on Growth Performance and Digestive Function of Feedlot Cattle during Periods of Elevated Ambient Temperature.

Authors:  J Salinas-Chavira; C Arzola; V González-Vizcarra; O M Manríquez-Núñez; M F Montaño-Gómez; J D Navarrete-Reyes; C Raymundo; R A Zinn
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.509

Review 10.  Effect of Probiotics/Prebiotics on Cattle Health and Productivity.

Authors:  Yutaka Uyeno; Suguru Shigemori; Takeshi Shimosato
Journal:  Microbes Environ       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.