BACKGROUND: Physicians are still concerned about prescribing beta-blockers in diabetic patients with heart failure. METHODS: In the outcome research study (the Beta-Blockers in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure: Guided Use in Clinical Practice [BRING-UP] study), the responsible clinicians could decide whether to start beta-blocker treatment and which agent to use. A total of 3091 patients were enrolled by 202 cardiologic centers: 25% of the recruited patients were already on beta-blockers, 28% started treatment at the enrollment visit, and 47% were not started on beta-blockers. RESULTS: The 1-year mortality, hospitalization rate, and the combined end point of mortality or hospitalization were higher in diabetic patients (15.8% versus 10.9%; relative risk [RR] = 1.44; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.16-1.78, P =.001) (31.0% versus 24.0%; RR = 1.28; 95% CI 1.11-1.49; P =.0009) (40.5% versus 30.1%; RR = 1.35; 95% CI 1.19-1.51; P =.0001). The event-free analysis of the 4 groups (diabetic patients not treated with beta-blockers, diabetic patients treated with beta-blockers, nondiabetic patients not treated with beta-blockers, nondiabetic patients treated with beta-blockers) showed that patients treated with beta-blockers had a higher event-free probability than patients not treated with beta-blockers regardless the presence of diabetes (P <.0001). CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of post hoc analysis, diabetic patients with chronic heart failure benefit from beta-blockers even if at a lower degree. Thus, there are no justifications to avoid beta-blockers in heart failure patients in the presence of diabetes.
BACKGROUND: Physicians are still concerned about prescribing beta-blockers in diabeticpatients with heart failure. METHODS: In the outcome research study (the Beta-Blockers in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure: Guided Use in Clinical Practice [BRING-UP] study), the responsible clinicians could decide whether to start beta-blocker treatment and which agent to use. A total of 3091 patients were enrolled by 202 cardiologic centers: 25% of the recruited patients were already on beta-blockers, 28% started treatment at the enrollment visit, and 47% were not started on beta-blockers. RESULTS: The 1-year mortality, hospitalization rate, and the combined end point of mortality or hospitalization were higher in diabeticpatients (15.8% versus 10.9%; relative risk [RR] = 1.44; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.16-1.78, P =.001) (31.0% versus 24.0%; RR = 1.28; 95% CI 1.11-1.49; P =.0009) (40.5% versus 30.1%; RR = 1.35; 95% CI 1.19-1.51; P =.0001). The event-free analysis of the 4 groups (diabeticpatients not treated with beta-blockers, diabeticpatients treated with beta-blockers, nondiabeticpatients not treated with beta-blockers, nondiabeticpatients treated with beta-blockers) showed that patients treated with beta-blockers had a higher event-free probability than patients not treated with beta-blockers regardless the presence of diabetes (P <.0001). CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of post hoc analysis, diabeticpatients with chronic heart failure benefit from beta-blockers even if at a lower degree. Thus, there are no justifications to avoid beta-blockers in heart failurepatients in the presence of diabetes.
Authors: Sanjai Sinha; Matthew Goldstein; Joan Penrod; Tsivia Hochman; Mohammad Kamran; Craig Tenner; Gabriela Cohen; Mark D Schwartz Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Carolyn Miller Reilly; Javed Butler; Steven D Culler; Rebecca A Gary; Melinda Higgins; Peter Schindler; Brittany Butts; Sandra B Dunbar Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2015-07-08 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: Sandra B Dunbar; Brittany Butts; Carolyn M Reilly; Rebecca A Gary; Melinda K Higgins; Erin P Ferranti; Steven D Culler; Javed Butler Journal: Nurs Outlook Date: 2013-10-02 Impact factor: 3.250
Authors: Selma F Mohammed; Barry A Borlaug; Véronique L Roger; Sultan A Mirzoyev; Richard J Rodeheffer; Julio A Chirinos; Margaret M Redfield Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2012-10-17 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Terri R Fried; John O'Leary; Virginia Towle; Mary K Goldstein; Mark Trentelange; Deanna K Martin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-11-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Christopher J Rush; Ross T Campbell; Pardeep S Jhund; Mark C Petrie; John J V McMurray Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 29.983