Literature DB >> 12815019

Interaction between gaze and pointing toward remembered visual targets.

M A Admiraal1, N L W Keijsers, C C A M Gielen.   

Abstract

We examined the role of gaze in a task where subjects had to reproduce the position of a remembered visual target with the tip of the index finger, referred to as pointing. Subjects were tested in 3 visual feedback conditions: complete darkness (dark), complete darkness with visual feedback of the finger position (finger), and with vision of a well-defined environment and feedback of the finger position (frame). Pointing accuracy increases with feedback about the finger or visual environment. In the finger and frame conditions, the 95% confidence regions of the variable errors have an ellipsoidal distribution with the main axis oriented toward the subjects' head. During the 1-s period when the target is visible, gaze is almost on target. However, gaze drifts away from the target relative to the subject in the delay period after target disappearance. In the finger and frame conditions, gaze returns toward the remembered target during pointing. In all 3 feedback conditions, the correlations between the variable errors of gaze and pointing position increase during the delay period, reaching highly significant values at the time of pointing. Our results demonstrate that gaze affects the accuracy of pointing. We conclude that the covariance between gaze and pointing position reflects a common drive for gaze and arm movements and an effect of gaze on pointing accuracy at the time of pointing. Previous studies interpreted the orientation of variable errors as indicative for a frame of reference used for pointing. Our results suggest that the orientation of the error ellipses toward the head is at least partly the result of gaze drift in the delay period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12815019     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00429.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  13 in total

1.  Visual, motor and attentional influences on proprioceptive contributions to perception of hand path rectilinearity during reaching.

Authors:  Robert A Scheidt; Kyle P Lillis; Scott J Emerson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Brain activation related to combinations of gaze position, visual input, and goal-directed hand movements.

Authors:  Patrick Bédard; Min Wu; Jerome N Sanes
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Different damping responses explain vertical endpoint error differences between visual conditions.

Authors:  Jan M Hondzinski; Chelsea M Soebbing; Allyson E French; Sara A Winges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Visual motion due to eye movements helps guide the hand.

Authors:  David Whitney; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Manual tracking in three dimensions.

Authors:  Leigh A Mrotek; C C A M Gielen; Martha Flanders
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-25       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Allocentric cues do not always improve whole body reaching performance.

Authors:  Jan M Hondzinski; Yongqin Cui
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-25       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Visually guided movements to color targets.

Authors:  Brian J White; Dirk Kerzel; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Pointing control using a moving base of support.

Authors:  Jan M Hondzinski; Taegyong Kwon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Patterns of hypermetria and terminal cocontraction during point-to-point movements demonstrate independent action of trajectory and postural controllers.

Authors:  Robert A Scheidt; Claude Ghez; Supriya Asnani
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Gaze direction and the extraction of egocentric distance.

Authors:  Daniel A Gajewski; Courtney P Wallin; John W Philbeck
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.