Literature DB >> 12814852

A method for controlling for a high placebo response rate in a comparison of venlafaxine XR and diazepam in the short-term treatment of patients with generalised anxiety disorder.

David Hackett1, Vincent Haudiquet, Eliseo Salinas.   

Abstract

This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study compared the efficacy of venlafaxine XR (75 or 150 mg/d) with diazepam (15 mg/d) over an 8-week treatment period in 540 non-depressed outpatients with generalised anxiety disorder (GAD). At week 8, significant improvements from baseline were observed in the venlafaxine XR, diazepam and placebo groups. Although these improvements were higher in the first two groups than in the placebo group for each of the primary efficacy variables (Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) total, HAM-A psychic anxiety factor, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD) anxiety sub-scale and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) improvement), there were no statistically significant differences between groups. These non-positive results were thought to be due to the very high placebo response observed in some centres. To understand the variability of the study, a secondary preplanned analysis was performed. This involved sub-dividing the study centres according to their ability to detect a two-point mean difference between diazepam and placebo at week 8 on the HAM-A total score. Centres able to show such a difference were termed verum-sensitive. Improvements from baseline to week 8 in venlafaxine XR-treated patients from verum-sensitive centres were significantly greater than in placebo on each of the primary efficacy measures (P </= 0.05). This suggests that those centres able to detect an anxiolytic effect of diazepam were also able to detect an anxiolytic effect of venlafaxine XR. Significant differences in baseline demographics, rates of adverse event reporting and rates of patient discontinuations were noted between patients enrolled at verum-sensitive and verum-insensitive sites. These results reflect the importance of study centre selection in accurately determining efficacy in placebo-controlled trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12814852     DOI: 10.1016/s0924-9338(03)00046-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Psychiatry        ISSN: 0924-9338            Impact factor:   5.361


  9 in total

1.  Psychological and pharmacological treatments for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD): a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Emily Carl; Sara M Witcraft; Brooke Y Kauffman; Eilis M Gillespie; Eni S Becker; Pim Cuijpers; Michael Van Ameringen; Jasper A J Smits; Mark B Powers
Journal:  Cogn Behav Ther       Date:  2019-02-14

Review 2.  Comparing the efficacy of benzodiazepines and serotonergic anti-depressants for adults with generalized anxiety disorder: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Angelina F Gomez; Abigail L Barthel; Stefan G Hofmann
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 3.889

3.  The diagnosis and treatment of generalized anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Borwin Bandelow; Reinhard Boerner J; Siegfried Kasper; Michael Linden; Hans-Ulrich Wittchen; Hans-Jürgen Möller
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 4.  Mechanisms of the placebo effect in pain and psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  R D Holmes; A K Tiwari; J L Kennedy
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.550

Review 5.  The cost effectiveness of pharmacological treatments for generalized anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Ifigeneia Mavranezouli; Nick Meader; John Cape; Tim Kendall
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Clinical efficacy and safety of fluoxetine in generalized anxiety disorder in Chinese patients.

Authors:  Chuan Zou; Xiang Ding; Joseph H Flaherty; Birong Dong
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 2.570

7.  Short-term efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine extended release in adults with generalized anxiety disorder without depression: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xinyuan Li; Lijun Zhu; Yingying Su; Shaokuan Fang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  The noradrenergic paradox: implications in the management of depression and anxiety.

Authors:  Alonso Montoya; Robert Bruins; Martin A Katzman; Pierre Blier
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 2.570

9.  A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare) on menopausal symptoms: A high placebo response

Authors:  Masumeh Ghazanfarpour; Mona Najaf Najafi; Nosrat Baharian Sharghi; Mahsa Sadat Mousavi; Masoudeh Babakhanian; Hassan Rakhshanded
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2018-05-14
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.