Literature DB >> 12814763

Effects on bone mineral density of calcium and vitamin D supplementation in elderly women with vitamin D deficiency.

Franck Grados1, Michel Brazier, Saïd Kamel, Sigolène Duver, Nathalie Heurtebize, Mohamed Maamer, Marc Mathieu, Michèle Garabédian, Jean-Luc Sebert, Patrice Fardellone.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Calcium and vitamin D deficiency is common in older individuals, particularly those who live in nursing homes, and increases the risk of osteoporosis and fractures.
METHODS: We conducted a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study of combined supplementation with 500 mg of elemental calcium, as carbonate, and 400 IU of vitamin D bid for 12 months in women older than 65 years of age with vitamin D deficiency, defined as serum 25(OH)D concentrations </=12 ng/ml.
RESULTS: Mean patient age was 75 +/- 7 years, and median daily dietary intakes of calcium and vitamin D were 697 mg and 66.8 IU in the supplemented group (n = 95) and 671 mg and 61.8 IU in the placebo group (n = 97). The median serum 25(OH)D level was 7.0 ng/ml in both groups, and the medial intact parathyroid hormone (PTHi) levels were 49 and 48 pg/ml in the supplemented and placebo groups, respectively. The median increase in serum 25(OH)D was 22.0 ng/ml in the supplemented group and 4 ng/ml in the placebo group (P < 0.0001), and the median PTHi decrease was 17 and 5 pg/ml, respectively (P < 0.0001). The median bone mineral density increase was significantly greater in the supplemented group than in the placebo group: +2.98% vs. -0.21% at L2-L4 (P = 0.0009), +1.19% and -0.83% at the femoral neck (P = 0.015), +0.86% and -0.56% at the trochanter (P = 0.015), and +0.99% and +0.11% for the whole body (P = 0.01). Similarly, the median decrease in the main bone markers was significantly greater in the treated group than in the placebo group: -1.35 microg/l vs. +0.50 microg/l for bone alkaline phosphatase (P = 0.008), -16.6 nmol/mmol creatinine vs. -2.3 nmol/mmol creatinine for urinary type I amino-terminal telopeptide (P = 0.001), and -896 pmol/l vs. -201 pmol/l for serum type I carboxy-terminal telopeptide (P = 0.003). We found no significant differences between the two groups for serum calcium, although urinary calcium excretion changed more in the supplemented group than in the placebo group. In conclusion, bone mass in older women with vitamin D deficiency increases significantly at the lumbar spine, femur, trochanter, and whole body after calcium and vitamin D supplementation for 1 year, and concomitantly bone markers improved as vitamin D levels returned to normal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12814763     DOI: 10.1016/s1297-319x(03)00046-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Joint Bone Spine        ISSN: 1297-319X            Impact factor:   4.929


  20 in total

Review 1.  Vitamin D in adult health and disease: a review and guideline statement from Osteoporosis Canada.

Authors:  David A Hanley; Ann Cranney; Glenville Jones; Susan J Whiting; William D Leslie; David E C Cole; Stephanie A Atkinson; Robert G Josse; Sidney Feldman; Gregory A Kline; Cheryl Rosen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Nutritional assessment of residents in long-term care facilities (LTCFs): recommendations of the task force on nutrition and ageing of the IAGG European region and the IANA.

Authors:  A Salva; L Coll-Planas; S Bruce; L De Groot; S Andrieu; G Abellan; B Vellas; Sandrine Andrieu; Luisa Bartorelli; Ytshal N Berner; Stuart Bruce; Bruno Corman; Alex Domingo; Thomas P Egger; Lisette de Groot; Yves Guigoz; Ana Imedio; Mercè Planas; Concha Porras; Joan Carles Rovira; Antoni Salvà; José Antonio Serra; Bruno Vellas
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.075

Review 3.  ISSN exercise & sports nutrition review update: research & recommendations.

Authors:  Chad M Kerksick; Colin D Wilborn; Michael D Roberts; Abbie Smith-Ryan; Susan M Kleiner; Ralf Jäger; Rick Collins; Mathew Cooke; Jaci N Davis; Elfego Galvan; Mike Greenwood; Lonnie M Lowery; Robert Wildman; Jose Antonio; Richard B Kreider
Journal:  J Int Soc Sports Nutr       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 5.150

4.  The association between breast cancer prognostic indicators and serum 25-OH vitamin D levels.

Authors:  Luke J Peppone; Aaron S Rickles; Michelle C Janelsins; Michael R Insalaco; Kristin A Skinner
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Spectacular improvement in vitamin D status in elderly osteoporotic women: 8-year analysis of an osteoporotic population treated in a dedicated fracture liaison service.

Authors:  A Amouzougan; A Deygat; B Trombert; E Constant; D Denarié; H Marotte; T Thomas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Influence of season, ethnicity, and chronicity on vitamin D deficiency in traumatic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Christina V Oleson; Payal H Patel; Lisa-Ann Wuermser
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.985

7.  Quantitative analysis of efficacy and associated factors of calcium intake on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  J Wu; L Xu; Y Lv; L Dong; Q Zheng; L Li
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  The effect of various vitamin D supplementation regimens in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Luke J Peppone; Alissa J Huston; Mary E Reid; Randy N Rosier; Yousef Zakharia; Donald L Trump; Karen M Mustian; Michelle C Janelsins; Jason Q Purnell; Gary R Morrow
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Is a lower dose of vitamin D supplementation enough to increase 25(OH)D status in a sunny country?

Authors:  Giselle A P Pignotti; Patrícia S Genaro; Marcelo M Pinheiro; Vera L Szejnfeld; Lígia A Martini
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 5.614

Review 10.  Dietary supplements and disease prevention - a global overview.

Authors:  Susanne Rautiainen; JoAnn E Manson; Alice H Lichtenstein; Howard D Sesso
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 43.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.