Literature DB >> 12814604

Seed-cache exchange promotes coexistence and coupled consumer oscillations: a model of desert rodents as resource processors.

Mary V Price1, John E Mittler.   

Abstract

Most models of resource competition assume that coexistence of consumers depends on tradeoffs in their abilities to exploit shared resources along dimensions of environmental heterogeneity generated by factors external to the consumers. However, consumers may create heterogeneity themselves by modifying resources that they do not immediately consume; such "resource processing" is predicted to allow coexistence if consumers vary in use of resources in primary vs. modified form. To explore whether external food storage (caching) represents a form of resource processing that contributes to observed patterns of species coexistence, we developed a biologically explicit simulation model of competition for a well-studied system, seed-eating desert heteromyid rodents. Here we present the model, compare competitive outcomes with and without inter-specific exchange of cached food, and describe population dynamics of coexisting competitors. The model predicts stable coexistence only when there is exchange of cached seeds via scavenging of caches left undefended by mortality or by pilferage of defended caches. Net interactions between coexisting consumers ranged from competition (10% of cases) to host-parasite (77%), commensalism (12%), and mutualism (1%). Population dynamics of coexisting consumers often showed strong periodicity and coupled synchronous or slightly lagged cycles, a possibility not previously anticipated for desert rodents occupying constant environments. Our model confirms that caching does represent a form of resource processing likely to play a significant role in the dynamics and diversity of communities of desert rodents and other caching animals.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12814604     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5193(03)00088-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  2 in total

Review 1.  The history of scatter hoarding studies.

Authors:  Anders Brodin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Context-dependent responses of food-hoarding to competitors in Apodemus peninsulae: implications for coexistence among asymmetrical species.

Authors:  Hongyu Niu; Jie Zhang; Zhiyong Wang; Guangchuan Huang; Chao Peng; Hongmao Zhang
Journal:  Integr Zool       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.654

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.