Literature DB >> 12814601

A flexible model of foraging by a honey bee colony: the effects of individual behaviour on foraging success.

Melissa D Cox1, Mary R Myerscough.   

Abstract

This paper develops and explores a model of foraging in honey bee colonies. The model may be applied to forage sources with various properties, and to colonies with different foraging-related parameters. In particular, we examine the effect of five foraging-related parameters on the foraging response and consequent nectar intake of a homogeneous colony. The parameters investigated affect different quantities critical to the foraging cycle--visit rate (affected by g), probability of dancing (mpd and bpd), duration of dancing (mcirc), or probability of abandonment (A). We show that one parameter, A, affects nectar intake in a nonlinear way. Further, we show that colonies with a midrange value of any foraging parameter perform better than the average of colonies with high- and low-range values, when profitable sources are available. Together these observations suggest that a heterogeneous colony, in which a range of parameter values are present, may perform better than a homogeneous colony. We modify the model to represent heterogeneous colonies and use it to show that the most important effect of heterogeneous foraging behaviour within the colony is to reduce the variance in the average quantity of nectar collected by heterogeneous colonies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12814601     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5193(03)00085-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  9 in total

1.  The effect of a non-uniform turning kernel on ant trail morphology.

Authors:  Andrew D Vincent; Mary R Myerscough
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2004-04-23       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Genetic polymorphism in leaf-cutting ants is phenotypically plastic.

Authors:  William O H Hughes; Jacobus J Boomsma
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Acquisition of a time-memory in forager honey bees.

Authors:  Darrell Moore; Patrick Doherty
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Spatial effects, sampling errors, and task specialization in the honey bee.

Authors:  B R Johnson
Journal:  Insectes Soc       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 1.643

5.  A Consensus-Based Grouping Algorithm for Multi-agent Cooperative Task Allocation with Complex Requirements.

Authors:  Simon Hunt; Qinggang Meng; Chris Hinde; Tingwen Huang
Journal:  Cognit Comput       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 5.418

6.  Error in the honeybee waggle dance improves foraging flexibility.

Authors:  Ryuichi Okada; Hidetoshi Ikeno; Toshifumi Kimura; Mizue Ohashi; Hitoshi Aonuma; Etsuro Ito
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  An energetics-based honeybee nectar-foraging model used to assess the potential for landscape-level pesticide exposure dilution.

Authors:  Johannes M Baveco; Andreas Focks; Dick Belgers; Jozef J M van der Steen; Jos J T I Boesten; Ivo Roessink
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Regulation of harvester ant foraging as a closed-loop excitable system.

Authors:  Renato Pagliara; Deborah M Gordon; Naomi Ehrich Leonard
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Genotypic influence on aversive conditioning in honeybees, using a novel thermal reinforcement procedure.

Authors:  Pierre Junca; Julie Carcaud; Sibyle Moulin; Lionel Garnery; Jean-Christophe Sandoz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.