Literature DB >> 12814581

Spatial vs. object specific attention in high-order visual areas.

Galia Avidan1, Ifat Levy, Talma Hendler, Ehud Zohary, Rafael Malach.   

Abstract

Recently we reported that the topographic organization of visual field eccentricity in human visual cortex extends into high-order, ventral occipitotemporal (VOT) cortex. Within this cortex, regions that respond preferentially to faces and buildings have specific eccentricity biases, suggesting that this category-eccentricity association may reflect differential needs of recognition processes. However, it is still not clear to what extent this center/periphery differentiation within high-order occipitotemporal cortex depends on immediate, moment-to-moment, task demands. Previous attention studies were confined either to exploring the visual field topography (spatial attention) or to object identity (object-based attention). Here, we combined the investigation of these two different attentional mechanisms in the same study. We found that the main source of attentional modulation in occipitotemporal cortex was object-based attention. Shifting attention to different object categories (buildings, faces, and arrows) substantially modulated the object-related activations. The differential activation to each object category in occipitotemporal object areas was maintained, albeit at a reduced level, even when attention was focused on different spatial locations. A slight eccentricity-related attentional differentiation was observed in the more dorsal lateral occipital region, but not in the VOT cortex. These results argue against the possibility that the source of the eccentricity differentiation in VOT cortex is due solely to moment-to-moment shifts in spatial attention mechanism and supports the notion that the eccentricity-biased maps found in this region are due to built-in shape selectivity established over long-term processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12814581     DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00092-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  7 in total

1.  Crosstalk between on-line and off-line processing of visual features.

Authors:  Johan Lauwereyns; Regan Wisnewski; Kirsten Keown; Sonal Govan
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-01-22

2.  Within-subject reproducibility of category-specific visual activation with functional MRI.

Authors:  Marius V Peelen; Paul E Downing
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Multiple reference frames used by the human brain for spatial perception and memory.

Authors:  Gaspare Galati; Gina Pelle; Alain Berthoz; Giorgia Committeri
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Connectivity of the ventral visual cortex is necessary for object recognition in patients.

Authors:  Ye Li; Yuxing Fang; Xiaoying Wang; Luping Song; Ruiwang Huang; Zaizhu Han; Gaolang Gong; Yanchao Bi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 5.  Evaluating functional localizers: the case of the FFA.

Authors:  Marc G Berman; Joonkoo Park; Richard Gonzalez; Thad A Polk; Amanda Gehrke; Scott Knaffla; John Jonides
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  TMS can reveal contrasting functions of the dorsal and ventral visual processing streams.

Authors:  Amanda Ellison; Alan Cowey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Brain regions involved in processing facial identity and expression are differentially selective for surface and edge information.

Authors:  Richard J Harris; Andrew W Young; Timothy J Andrews
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 6.556

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.