Literature DB >> 12814380

What you believe versus what you think they believe: a neuroimaging study of conceptual perspective-taking.

Perrine Ruby1, Jean Decety.   

Abstract

Social communication requires shared representations as well as a cognitive flexibility for successful interactions between self and other. What neural mechanisms underlie the ability to distinguish between our own perspective vs. the perspective of others at a conceptual level? In this PET study subjects who were medical students were asked according to the experimental conditions to respond to a list of health-related questions, taking either their own perspective or the perspective of a 'lay person'. Third-person perspective as compared to first-person perspective was associated with activation in the medial part of the superior frontal gyrus, in the left superior temporal sulcus, in the left temporal pole and in the right inferior parietal lobe. The reverse comparison revealed a specific activation in the postcentral gyrus for the first-person conceptual perspective. This study provides congruent results at the conceptual level with previous studies investigating the neural correlates of self/other distinction at the motor level, and opens a new area of research in which conceptual cognition can be viewed in the continuity of motor cognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12814380     DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02673.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  109 in total

1.  Mental imagery of self-location during spontaneous and active self-other interactions: an electrical neuroimaging study.

Authors:  Bérangère Thirioux; Manuel R Mercier; Gérard Jorland; Alain Berthoz; Olaf Blanke
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Neural Correlates of Self and Its Interaction With Memory in Healthy Adolescents.

Authors:  Fanny Dégeilh; Bérengère Guillery-Girard; Jacques Dayan; Malo Gaubert; Gaël Chételat; Pierre-Jean Egler; Jean-Marc Baleyte; Francis Eustache; Armelle Viard
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2015-10-07

3.  Resting brain activity varies with dream recall frequency between subjects.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Eichenlaub; Alain Nicolas; Jérôme Daltrozzo; Jérôme Redouté; Nicolas Costes; Perrine Ruby
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 7.853

4.  The right temporoparietal junction plays a causal role in maintaining the internal representation of verticality.

Authors:  Francesca Fiori; Matteo Candidi; Adriano Acciarino; Nicole David; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Is our brain hardwired to produce God, or is our brain hardwired to perceive God? A systematic review on the role of the brain in mediating religious experience.

Authors:  Alexander A Fingelkurts; Andrew A Fingelkurts
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2009-05-27

6.  The influence of prior record on moral judgment.

Authors:  Dorit Kliemann; Liane Young; Jonathan Scholz; Rebecca Saxe
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Cognitive and neural foundations of religious belief.

Authors:  Dimitrios Kapogiannis; Aron K Barbey; Michael Su; Giovanna Zamboni; Frank Krueger; Jordan Grafman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Differential involvement of the posterior temporal cortex in mentalizing but not perspective taking.

Authors:  Nicole David; Carolin Aumann; Natacha S Santos; Bettina H Bewernick; Simon B Eickhoff; Albert Newen; N Jon Shah; Gereon R Fink; Kai Vogeley
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Overlapping and non-overlapping brain regions for theory of mind and self reflection in individual subjects.

Authors:  Rebecca Saxe; Joseph M Moran; Jonathan Scholz; John Gabrieli
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Empathy and motivation for justice: Cognitive empathy and concern, but not emotional empathy, predict sensitivity to injustice for others.

Authors:  Jean Decety; Keith J Yoder
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 2.083

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.