Literature DB >> 12813842

Screening sigmoidoscopy: a randomised trial of invitation style.

M Gray1, C R Pennington.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine uptake rates for screening sigmoidoscopy and whether offering prior consultation about sigmoidoscopic screening improves the uptake rate.
DESIGN: Patients between 50.5-60.5 years of age registered with one practice were identified and offered screening sigmoidoscopy. Patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups. The first group was sent an invitation to have screening sigmoidoscopy along with an explanatory leaflet. The second group was sent the same invitation and leaflet but with an added option to discuss the test in the first instance with their general practitioner. Response rates (regarding reply to initial invitation and subsequent attendance for screening) in the two groups were measured.
SETTING: Urban General Practice, Dundee, Scotland, UK.
RESULTS: The overall uptake rate was low at 24%. Significantly fewer people in the second group (i.e. those with the option to discuss first) replied to the initial invitation. Assessing those who did reply, there was no difference between the two groups in numbers who thereafter went on to attend for screening. Only two percent of people took up the offer to find out more about the test from their general practitioner.
CONCLUSIONS: The offer of flexible sigmoidoscopy as a screening test for colorectal cancer generates little interest in this population at present and compliance rates are low. The offer of prior consultation about the procedure with a patient's own general practitioner is not sufficient to generate interest. These results highlight potential difficulties with the introduction of a mass screening program.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 12813842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Bull (Edinb)        ISSN: 0374-8014


  6 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to promote colorectal cancer screening: an integrative review.

Authors:  Susan M Rawl; Usha Menon; Allison Burness; Erica S Breslau
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.250

2.  Recruiting South Asians to a lifestyle intervention trial: experiences and lessons from PODOSA (Prevention of Diabetes & Obesity in South Asians).

Authors:  Anne Douglas; Raj S Bhopal; Ruby Bhopal; John F Forbes; Jason M R Gill; Julia Lawton; John McKnight; Gordon Murray; Naveed Sattar; Anu Sharma; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Sunita Wallia; Sarah H Wild; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Using resource modelling to inform decision making and service planning: the case of colorectal cancer screening in Ireland.

Authors:  Linda Sharp; Lesley Tilson; Sophie Whyte; Alan O Ceilleachair; Cathal Walsh; Cara Usher; Paul Tappenden; James Chilcott; Anthony Staines; Michael Barry; Harry Comber
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Recruitment to multicentre trials--lessons from UKCTOCS: descriptive study.

Authors:  Usha Menon; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Andy Ryan; Aarti Sharma; Matthew Burnell; Rachel Hallett; Sara Lewis; Alberto Lopez; Keith Godfrey; David Oram; Jonathan Herod; Karin Williamson; Mourad Seif; Ian Scott; Tim Mould; Robert Woolas; John Murdoch; Stephen Dobbs; Nazar Amso; Simon Leeson; Derek Cruickshank; Ali McGuire; Stuart Campbell; Lesley Fallowfield; Steve Skates; Mahesh Parmar; Ian Jacobs
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-11-13

Review 5.  Public awareness of colorectal cancer screening: knowledge, attitudes, and interventions for increasing screening uptake.

Authors:  Antonio Z Gimeno Garcia; Noemi Hernandez Alvarez Buylla; David Nicolas-Perez; Enrique Quintero
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2014-03-05

6.  Rapid review of evaluation of interventions to improve participation in cancer screening services.

Authors:  Stephen W Duffy; Jonathan P Myles; Roberta Maroni; Abeera Mohammad
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 2.136

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.