Literature DB >> 12813724

Linkage analysis with sequential imputation.

Zachary Skrivanek1, Shili Lin, Mark Irwin.   

Abstract

Multilocus calculations, using all available information on all pedigree members, are important for linkage analysis. Exact calculation methods in linkage analysis are limited in either the number of loci or the number of pedigree members they can handle. In this article, we propose a Monte Carlo method for linkage analysis based on sequential imputation. Unlike exact methods, sequential imputation can handle large pedigrees with a moderate number of loci in its current implementation. This Monte Carlo method is an application of importance sampling, in which we sequentially impute ordered genotypes locus by locus, and then impute inheritance vectors conditioned on these genotypes. The resulting inheritance vectors, together with the importance sampling weights, are used to derive a consistent estimator of any linkage statistic of interest. The linkage statistic can be parametric or nonparametric; we focus on nonparametric linkage statistics. We demonstrate that accurate estimates can be achieved within a reasonable computing time. A simulation study illustrates the potential gain in power using our method for multilocus linkage analysis with large pedigrees. We simulated data at six markers under three models. We analyzed them using both sequential imputation and GENEHUNTER. GENEHUNTER had to drop between 38-54% of pedigree members, whereas our method was able to use all pedigree members. The power gains of using all pedigree members were substantial under 2 of the 3 models. We implemented sequential imputation for multilocus linkage analysis in a user-friendly software package called SIMPLE. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12813724     DOI: 10.1002/gepi.10249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Epidemiol        ISSN: 0741-0395            Impact factor:   2.135


  3 in total

Review 1.  Haplotyping methods for pedigrees.

Authors:  Guimin Gao; David B Allison; Ina Hoeschele
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 0.444

2.  Comparisons of methods for linkage analysis and haplotype reconstruction using extended pedigree data.

Authors:  Shili Lin; Jie Ding; Crystal Dong; Zhenqiu Liu; Zhenxu J Ma; Shuyan Wan; Yan Xu
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2005-12-30       Impact factor: 2.797

3.  Linkage analysis of the simulated data - evaluations and comparisons of methods.

Authors:  Swati Biswas; Charalampos Papachristou; Mark E Irwin; Shili Lin
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2003-12-31       Impact factor: 2.797

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.