Literature DB >> 12813651

[Efficacy of inpatient rehabilitation for chronic back pain in Germany: a systematic review 1980-2001].

A Hüppe1, H Raspe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic back pain has a high personal impact, is frequent and of outstanding economical relevance. Analysis of the international literature indicates strong or moderate evidence for the effectiveness of multimodal multidisciplinary team care of chronic back pain. Our review aims at a complete review and critical appraisal of German studies of inpatient medical rehabilitation.
METHODS: We conducted a systematic search for relevant German studies (1/1980 - 6/2001) using electronic data bases, manual search of congress abstracts and postal questionnaires of 712 German rehabilitation clinics. Relevant studies were categorized according to the recommendation of the Cochrane Back Review Group. For all studies, aims, participants, type of intervention, evaluation time, main outcomes and results were extracted and tabulated. The effect size for 6 central outcome parameters (pain intensity, functional status, catastrophizing, depression, vitality, days on sickness leave) were calculated using pre-post comparisons and were integrated into short and long term weighted means of intra-group effect sizes.
RESULTS: 30 studies, both controlled and uncontrolled, report a multitude of positive changes with inpatient rehabilitation treatment. Improvements included both somatic and psychological parameters. However, methodological quality was often poor; only three studies fulfilled the criteria for high quality. Comparison of meta analyses of German and international studies indicates partly good agreement (e. g. changes in pain intensity), partly discrepancies (e. g. functional ability in daily activities). Taken together, inpatient rehabilitation treatment for chronic low back pain in Germany appears to be of low to moderate efficacy. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSIONS: In the era of evidence based medicine, inpatient rehabilitation has to show its usefulness, necessity and efficiency as any other type of health care. For the German system of inpatient rehabilitation of chronic back pain available evidence is not conclusive, due to a lack of randomised controlled studies. The prevailing design of observational cohort studies has severe limitations in proving a causal relationship between outcomes and intervention. The international literature however provides more valid evidence in favour of the multimodal multidisciplinary intervention in chronic back pain. Under the assumption of a "class effect" of medical rehabilitation the German data seem to corroborate the conclusions drawn from international studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12813651     DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-40099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rehabilitation (Stuttg)        ISSN: 0034-3536            Impact factor:   1.113


  9 in total

Review 1.  [Efficacy, utility and cost-effectiveness of multidisciplinary treatment for chronic low back pain].

Authors:  C Rolli Salathé; A Elfering; M Melloh
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.107

2.  Chronic low back pain: course of disease from the patient's perspective.

Authors:  T Wolter; E Szabo; R Becker; M Mohadjer; S M Knoeller
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-07-10       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  [Chronic low back pain : Replication of different reaction groups].

Authors:  M Holldorf; M Morfeld; M Möller; J Höder; U Koch
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.107

4.  [Rehabilitation of non-specific low back pain. Results of a multidisciplinary in-patient program].

Authors:  E Wagner; B Ehrenhofer; E Lackerbauer; U Pawelak; W Siegmeth
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.107

5.  Spinal deformities rehabilitation - state of the art review.

Authors:  Hans-Rudolf Weiss
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2010-12-24

6.  Work-related medical rehabilitation in patients with musculoskeletal disorders: the protocol of a propensity score matched effectiveness study (EVA-WMR, DRKS00009780).

Authors:  Silke Neuderth; Betje Schwarz; Christian Gerlich; Michael Schuler; Miriam Markus; Matthias Bethge
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Rehabilitation access and effectiveness for persons with back pain: the protocol of a cohort study (REHAB-BP, DRKS00011554).

Authors:  Matthias Bethge; Kerstin Mattukat; David Fauser; Wilfried Mau
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Pre-post changes in main outcomes of medical rehabilitation in Germany: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant and aggregated data.

Authors:  Michael Schuler; Kathrin Murauer; Stefanie Stangl; Anna Grau; Katharina Gabriel; Lauren Podger; Peter U Heuschmann; Hermann Faller
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Telephone-based aftercare groups for family carers of people with dementia - results of the effect evaluation of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Martin Berwig; Susanne Lessing; Ruth Deck
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 2.655

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.