Literature DB >> 1281354

Experimentalists and modelers: can we all just get along?

J M Bower1, C Koch.   

Abstract

How can the interaction between theoretical neuroscientists and their experimental counterparts be improved? This article discusses a number of suggestions relating to the presentation of data in experimental studies. In particular, published data should account for the diversity of response properties encountered, rather than concentrating on the 'representative' response, as well as emphasizing the stochastic nature of neurons by routinely including raw, unprocessed data from individual trials, which show the degree of variability prior to averaging.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1281354     DOI: 10.1016/0166-2236(92)90010-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Neurosci        ISSN: 0166-2236            Impact factor:   13.837


  4 in total

1.  Reviewing multi-disciplinary papers: a challenge in neuroscience?

Authors:  Erik De Schutter
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2008-10-21

2.  Get the rhythm: modeling neuronal activity.

Authors:  Patrick Meuth; Sven G Meuth; Daniel Jacobi; Tilman Broicher; Hans-Christian Pape; Thomas Budde
Journal:  J Undergrad Neurosci Educ       Date:  2005-10-15

3.  The effect of neural noise on spike time precision in a detailed CA3 neuron model.

Authors:  Eduard Kuriscak; Petr Marsalek; Julius Stroffek; Zdenek Wünsch
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2012-06-24       Impact factor: 2.238

4.  Analysis and Enhancements of a Prolific Macroscopic Model of Epilepsy.

Authors:  Christopher Fietkiewicz; Kenneth A Loparo
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2016-04-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.