Literature DB >> 12813264

Relevance of diagnostic diversity and patient volumes for quality and length of stay in pediatric intensive care units.

U E Ruttimann1, K M Patel, M M Pollack.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Investigation of associations of the diagnostic diversity and volumes with efficiency and quality of care.
DESIGN: Prospective observational study.
SETTING: Thirty-two pediatric intensive care units (PICUs), 16 selected by random cluster sampling, and 16 volunteering. PATIENTS: Consecutive admissions of 11,165 patients.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The main outcome measures were length of PICU stay (LOS) and mortality rate, adjusted by generalized linear regression and multivariate logistic regression, respectively. Each diagnosis was categorized into 21 predefined, mutually exclusive categories. Diagnostic diversity of each PICU was characterized by an information-theoretical measure (entropy). For a patient-level analysis, the associations of this measure and PICU patient volume with outcomes were using regression models. For an institution-level analysis, the outcome measures of each PICU were adjusted using ratios of observed/predicted (by the regression models) values, and the associations of these ratios with diagnostic diversity and patient volume were investigated using linear bivariate regressions. Diagnostic diversity ranged in the PICUs from 0.823 to 0.928, when standardized to the uniform distribution with entropy of 1. Congenital heart diseases (12.6%) head traumas (11.5%), other central nervous system conditions (9.7%), and pneumonias (8.7%) constituted the largest diagnostic categories. Patient-level analysis indicated that longer adjusted LOS was associated with larger diagnostic diversity (p <.0001) and lower admission volumes (p <.0001). However, for a given increase in diagnostic diversity, a large LOS increase was associated with low-volume, but not high-volume units. Severity-adjusted mortality rates were inversely related (p =.036) only with admission volumes, but not diagnostic mix. Institution-level standardized LOS ratios correlated with diagnostic diversity (r2 = 0.145; p =.031). Institution-level standardized mortality ratios were inversely related (r2 = 0.123; p =.049) with admission volumes.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient volumes encountered in a PICU are important for maintaining quality and efficiency of care. In low-volume units, fewer diagnoses and higher volumes were both associated with higher efficiencies. In high volume units, diagnosis-specific volumes were generally large enough for achieving diagnosis-independent efficiency. Diagnostic mix was not associated with PICU mortality ratios, but higher PICU volumes were associated with lower mortality rates.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 12813264     DOI: 10.1097/00130478-200010000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1529-7535            Impact factor:   3.624


  13 in total

1.  Measuring efficiency in Australian and New Zealand paediatric intensive care units.

Authors:  Lahn D Straney; Archie Clements; Jan Alexander; Anthony Slater
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Impact of inborn errors of metabolism on admission and mortality in a pediatric intensive care unit.

Authors:  Philippe Jouvet; Guy Touati; Fabrice Lesage; Laurent Dupic; Marisa Tucci; Jean Marie Saudubray; Philippe Hubert
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  Should critically ill children be managed in paediatric intensive care units only?

Authors:  Paolo Biban
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Profile of inborn errors of metabolism in a tertiary care centre PICU.

Authors:  Mahesh Kamate; Vivek Chetal; Vijaylaxmi Kulgod; Vishwanath Patil; Rita Christopher
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 1.967

5.  Improving Pediatric Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Means Delivering Best Care and Measuring Impact Beyond Survival.

Authors:  Ryan P Barbaro; Graeme MacLaren
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 6.  System-level planning, coordination, and communication: care of the critically ill and injured during pandemics and disasters: CHEST consensus statement.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Dichter; Robert K Kanter; David Dries; Valerie Luyckx; Matthew L Lim; John Wilgis; Michael R Anderson; Babak Sarani; Nathaniel Hupert; Ryan Mutter; Asha V Devereaux; Michael D Christian; Niranjan Kissoon
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Impact of inborn errors of metabolism on admission in a neonatal intensive care unit--a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Wenjun Tu; Jian He; Fang Dai; Xinyu Wang; Ying Li
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 1.967

8.  Demographic profile and outcome analysis of pediatric intensive care patients.

Authors:  E Volakli; M Sdougka; M Tamiolaki; C Tsonidis; M Reizoglou; M Giala
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 0.471

9.  International comparison of the performance of the paediatric index of mortality (PIM) 2 score in two national data sets.

Authors:  Stéphane Leteurtre; Bruno Grandbastien; Francis Leclerc; Roger Parslow
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  PICU Length of Stay: Factors Associated With Bed Utilization and Development of a Benchmarking Model.

Authors:  Murray M Pollack; Richard Holubkov; Ron Reeder; J Michael Dean; Kathleen L Meert; Robert A Berg; Christopher J L Newth; John T Berger; Rick E Harrison; Joseph Carcillo; Heidi Dalton; David L Wessel; Tammara L Jenkins; Robert Tamburro
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 3.624

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.