Literature DB >> 12812241

Triple major curves in children.

Darin Davidson1, Mervyn Letts, James Jarvis.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The predominant classification systems for scoliosis have been based either on etiology or curve pattern. Traditionally triple curves have not been included in either classification system.
METHODS: We reviewed the records of all children with an idiopathic triple scoliotic curve seen between 1988 and 2001 at the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, a major pediatric referral centre. The triple curve had 3 structural curved segments in accordance with the classification of Lenke and associates. Scoliosis was defined by a curve greater than 10 degrees, and the apical vertebra was determined according to Scoliosis Research Society guidelines. Laterality of the curve was determined from the curve with the greatest magnitude. Curve progression was an increase in magnitude of at least 5 degrees. Management included observation, with bracing if any curve progressed to greater than 20 degrees. Surgery was reserved for curves that were unstable, rapidly progressive and greater than 45 degrees-50 degrees.
RESULTS: Thirteen children (9 girls, 4 boys) were treated for a triple scoliosis curve. The average age at the time the triple curve developed was 13 years and 9 months (range from 9 yr 1 mo-17 yr 5 mo). The average follow-up was 3 years and 6 months (range from 1-11 yr). One child required spinal fusion, and 6 years postoperatively the curve was stable with a good fusion mass. Of the remaining children, 2 were treated with an orthosis and 10 with observation.
CONCLUSION: The triple major curve is a neglected curve pattern that should be included in classifications of scoliosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12812241      PMCID: PMC3211757     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  8 in total

1.  Multiple primary idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  F Travaglini
Journal:  Ital J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  1975-04

2.  Spinal deformity and back surface asymmetry in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  I A Stokes; J G Armstrong; M S Moreland
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis.

Authors:  L G Lenke; R R Betz; J Harms; K H Bridwell; D H Clements; T G Lowe; K Blanke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Spinal deformities in patients with Friedreich ataxia: a review of 19 patients.

Authors:  Y H Daher; J E Lonstein; R B Winter; D S Bradford
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1985 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.324

5.  Curve patterns in idiopathic scoliosis. A clinical and radiographic study.

Authors:  J L Cruickshank; M Koike; R A Dickson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1989-03

6.  Excision of hemivertebrae and wedge resection in the treatment of congenital scoliosis.

Authors:  D C Holte; R B Winter; J E Lonstein; F Denis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  A logical coronal pattern classification of 2,000 consecutive idiopathic scoliosis cases based on the scoliosis research society-defined apical vertebra.

Authors:  R W Coonrad; G A Murrell; G Motley; E Lytle; L A Hey
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Natural history of scoliosis in Friedreich's ataxia.

Authors:  H Labelle; S Tohmé; M Duhaime; P Allard
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 5.284

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Identification of susceptibility loci for scoliosis in FIS families with triple curves.

Authors:  Beth Marosy; Cristina M Justice; Cuong Vu; Andrew Zorn; Nneka Nzegwu; Alexander F Wilson; Nancy H Miller
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.802

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.