Literature DB >> 12812009

Impact of cisapride label changes on codispensing of contraindicated medications.

Jeff Jianfei Guo1, Suellen Curkendall, Judith K Jones, Daniel Fife, Earl Goehring, Dewei She.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the impact of the first three label changes and 'Dear Doctor' letters as sole interventions, sent to prescribers and pharmacists, on the prescribing and dispensing of cisapride and contraindicated drugs.
METHODS: Using a managed care claims database, a total of 38,757 patients with cisapride prescriptions (July 1993-December 1998) were selected. An interrupted time series analysis and an exponentially weighted moving average analysis (EWMA) were conducted to determine whether there were changes in the proportion of contraindicated codispensing following each intervention.
RESULTS: 3.6% of cisapride dispensing overlapped with contraindicated drug dispensing. Beginning in 1994, the overlapped proportions declined slowly from 4.5% ending at 3.2% in 1998. The interrupted time series analysis showed that there was a statistically significant abrupt permanent decrease in the proportion of contraindicated dispensing following the June 1998 label change (coefficient -1.0094, p = 0.045), meaning that the proportion of contraindicated dispensing dropped nearly one percentage point after the third intervention. The 1995 label changes did not have statistically significant effects. The EWMA analysis showed that the proportion of contraindicated dispensing was lower than 3 standard deviations below average during the period after the June 1998 intervention, with no significant effects following the two earlier interventions.
CONCLUSIONS: The June 1998 cisapride label change and accompanying 'Dear Doctor' letter had a downward impact on the proportion of dispensing of contraindicated drugs with cisapride. The other two label changes did not have independent significant impacts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12812009     DOI: 10.1002/pds.830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf        ISSN: 1053-8569            Impact factor:   2.890


  15 in total

Review 1.  Communication of medical product risk: how effective is effective enough?

Authors:  Stephen A Goldman
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Impact of safety-related regulatory action on clinical practice: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sigrid Piening; Flora M Haaijer-Ruskamp; Jonie T N de Vries; Menno E van der Elst; Pieter A de Graeff; Sabine M J M Straus; Peter G M Mol
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  A decade of safety-related regulatory action in the Netherlands: a retrospective analysis of direct healthcare professional communications from 1999 to 2009.

Authors:  Peter G M Mol; Sabine M J M Straus; Sigrid Piening; Jonie T N de Vries; Pieter A de Graeff; Flora M Haaijer-Ruskamp
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Effectiveness of safety warnings in atypical antipsychotic drugs: an interrupted time-series analysis in Spain.

Authors:  Gabriel Sanfélix-Gimeno; Pedro Cervera-Casino; Salvador Peiró; Beatriz González López-Valcarcel; Amparo Blázquez; Teresa Barbera
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Pharmacy students' knowledge of black box warnings.

Authors:  Karen E Moeller; Theresa I Shireman; Joyce Generali; Sally Rigler; Angela Mayorga
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  The impact in Japan of regulatory action on prescribing of dopamine receptor agonists: analysis of a claims database between 2005 and 2008.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Ooba; Takuhiro Yamaguchi; Kiyoshi Kubota
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Relevance of a "Dear Doctor letter" to alert healthcare providers to new recommendations for vitamin D administration.

Authors:  Hélène Théophile; Ghada Miremont-Salamé; Philip Robinson; Nicholas Moore; Bernard Bégaud; Françoise Haramburu
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Healthcare professionals' self-reported experiences and preferences related to direct healthcare professional communications: a survey conducted in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Sigrid Piening; Flora M Haaijer-Ruskamp; Pieter A de Graeff; Sabine M J M Straus; Peter G M Mol
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 9.  Impact of FDA drug risk communications on health care utilization and health behaviors: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stacie B Dusetzina; Ashley S Higashi; E Ray Dorsey; Rena Conti; Haiden A Huskamp; Shu Zhu; Craig F Garfield; G Caleb Alexander
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Implementing Black Box Warnings (BBWs) in Health Information Systems: An Organizing Taxonomy Identifying Opportunities and Challenges.

Authors:  M Ikezuagu; E Yang; A Daghstani; D C Kaelber
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 2.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.