Literature DB >> 12811320

Bowel preparation comparison: flavored versus unflavored colyte.

Ann Hayes1, Martha Buffum, Douglass Fuller.   

Abstract

Patients undergoing colonoscopy who have poor bowel cleansing must undergo repeated colon lavage and procedure, resulting in the possibility of additional discomfort and risk. Patient compliance with the necessary 4 liters of colon lavage fluid is essential. At our facility, the current colon lavage solution is unflavored and most patients complain about the taste. These are the patients who are likely to have poorly cleansed bowels. Patient preference for flavor of lavage is not known. A randomized controlled trial of 130 patients was undertaken to learn whether Colyte flavor made a difference in bowel cleansing. Results showed flavor made no difference in bowel cleansing (chi2 = 0.064, p =.96, NS); successful cleansing occurred in 75% (n = 45) of patients who received flavored and 76% (n = 53) who received unflavored Colyte. Results suggest flavor is not a factor in patients' completion of the prep nor cleansing effectiveness. As unflavored Colyte costs less than flavored, cost savings can result from continuing use of unflavored Colyte. While this clinical trial did not answer the dilemma about how to improve colon preparation, the staff's process of conducting nursing research inspired critical thinking and innovative problem-solving. Patients who are undergoing a colonoscopy are required to do a bowel cleansing the day before the procedure. Without proper bowel cleansing, colonic lesions such as polyps, neoplasms, and arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) may go undetected by being covered with small particles of stool ( Cohen et al., 1994). Poor bowel cleansing results in the need for repeat colon preparation and repeat procedure, which pose risk and discomfort for the patient and cost for the staff and institution. Done under moderate sedation, colonoscopy poses potential cardiac risks and respiratory problems for the patient. In addition, the endoscopy procedure itself could cause perforation and bleeding. Avoiding repeat procedures because of failed colonic preparation is, therefore, essential for patient safety and organization cost. Optimally, completing the colon prep solution results in adequate bowel cleansing. Prep flavor was theorized to be a possible cause of noncompliance. The purposes of this study were to determine whether patients' preferred prep solution would yield better compliance with the colon lavage solution and whether the improved compliance results in an adequately prepared bowel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12811320     DOI: 10.1097/00001610-200305000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterol Nurs        ISSN: 1042-895X            Impact factor:   0.978


  7 in total

1.  Polyethylene glycol vs. sodium phosphate for bowel preparation: a treatment arm meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ravi Juluri; George Eckert; Thomas F Imperiale
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 2.  Meta-analysis: randomized controlled trials of 4-L polyethylene glycol and sodium phosphate solution as bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  R Juluri; G Eckert; T F Imperiale
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 8.171

3.  Electrolyte changes after bowel preparation for colonoscopy: A randomized controlled multicenter trial.

Authors:  Kyong Joo Lee; Hong Jun Park; Hyun-Soo Kim; Kwang Ho Baik; Yeon Soo Kim; Sung Chul Park; Hyun Il Seo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Efficacy of morning-only 4 liter sulfa free polyethylene glycol vs 2 liter polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid for afternoon colonoscopy.

Authors:  John M Rivas; Alejandro Perez; Marlow Hernandez; Alison Schneider; Fernando J Castro
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Interventions for enhancing medication adherence.

Authors:  Robby Nieuwlaat; Nancy Wilczynski; Tamara Navarro; Nicholas Hobson; Rebecca Jeffery; Arun Keepanasseril; Thomas Agoritsas; Niraj Mistry; Alfonso Iorio; Susan Jack; Bhairavi Sivaramalingam; Emma Iserman; Reem A Mustafa; Dawn Jedraszewski; Chris Cotoi; R Brian Haynes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-11-20

6.  Beverage intake preference and bowel preparation laxative taste preference for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Adeyinka O Laiyemo; Clinton Burnside; Maryam A Laiyemo; John Kwagyan; Carla D Williams; Kolapo A Idowu; Hassan Ashktorab; Angesom Kibreab; Victor F Scott; Andrew K Sanderson
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2015-08-06

7.  Predictive factors for inadequate bowel preparation using low-volume polyethylene glycol (PEG) plus ascorbic acid for an outpatient colonoscopy.

Authors:  Seung Yong Shin; Kyeong Seon Ga; In Young Kim; Yoo Mi Park; Da Hyun Jung; Jie-Hyun Kim; Young Hoon Youn; Hyojin Park; Jae Jun Park
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.