Literature DB >> 12811268

Local kyphosis reduces surgical outcomes of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Kota Suda1, Kuniyoshi Abumi, Manabu Ito, Yasuhiro Shono, Kiyoshi Kaneda, Masanori Fujiya.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This retrospective study analyzed the effects of cervical alignment on surgical results of expansive laminoplasty (ELAP) for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).
OBJECTIVE: To determine the limitation of posterior decompression by ELAP for CSM in the presence of local kyphosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Several studies have reported that cervical malalignment affected surgical outcomes of ELAP. However, there has been no report to demonstrate crucial determinants of surgical outcomes of ELAP for CSM in relation to cervical sagittal alignment.
METHODS: The study group comprised 114 patients who underwent ELAP for CSM. All were followed up for more than 2 years. The Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scoring system for cervical myelopathy (full score, 17 points) was used to evaluate surgical outcomes for each patient 2 years after surgery. Statistical analysis with multivariate logistic regression models was used to ascertain the risk factors affecting postoperative surgical outcomes.
RESULTS: The average JOA scores were 9.9 points before surgery and 14 points 2 years after surgery. The recovery rate was 60.2%. Statistical analysis showed that signal intensity change on MRI and local kyphosis were the most crucial risk factors for poor surgical outcomes. Calculated with the logistic regression model, the highest risk of poor recovery was local kyphosis exceeding 13 degrees.
CONCLUSIONS: The influence of cervical malalignment on neurologic recovery after ELAP for CSM was shown. When patients have local kyphosis exceeding 13 degrees, anterior decompression or posterior correction of kyphosis as well as ELAP should be considered. Expansive laminoplasty for CSM is best indicated for patients with local kyphosis less than 13 degrees.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12811268     DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000065487.82469.D9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  91 in total

1.  Prediction of lower limb functional recovery after laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy: focusing on the 10-s step test.

Authors:  Hiroaki Nakashima; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Keigo Ito; Masaaki Machino; Shunsuke Kanbara; Daigo Morita; Hiroshi Takahashi; Shiro Imagama; Zenya Ito; Naoki Ishiguro; Fumihiko Kato
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Predicted cervical canal enlargement and effective cord decompression following expansive laminoplasty using cervical magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Mohd Imran Yusof; Eskandar Hassan; Shafie Abdullah
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-07-24       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Retrospective cohort study between selective and standard C3-7 laminoplasty. Minimum 2-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Takashi Tsuji; Takashi Asazuma; Kazunori Masuoka; Hiroki Yasuoka; Takao Motosuneya; Tsubasa Sakai; Koichi Nemoto
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Posterior approach to the degenerative cervical spine.

Authors:  Kazuo Yonenobu; Takenori Oda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-08-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Cervical laminectomy and instrumented lateral mass fusion: techniques, pearls and pitfalls.

Authors:  Michael Mayer; Oliver Meier; Alexander Auffarth; Heiko Koller
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Comparison of ventral corpectomy and plate-screw-instrumented fusion with dorsal laminectomy and rod-screw-instrumented fusion for treatment of at least two vertebral-level spondylotic cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Rudolf Andreas Kristof; Thomas Kiefer; Marcus Thudium; Florian Ringel; Michael Stoffel; Attlila Kovacs; Christian-Andreas Mueller
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  C5 nerve palsy after posterior reconstruction surgery: predictive risk factors of the incidence and critical range of correction for kyphosis.

Authors:  Takuto Kurakawa; Hiroshi Miyamoto; Shuichi Kaneyama; Masatoshi Sumi; Koki Uno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Degenerative spondylolisthesis does not influence surgical results of laminoplasty in elderly cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients.

Authors:  Hideki Shigematsu; Yurito Ueda; Toshichika Takeshima; Munehisa Koizumi; Nobuhisa Satoh; Hiroaki Matsumori; Takuya Oshima; Masato Tanaka; Atsuo Kugai; Yoshinori Takakura; Yasuhito Tanaka
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  [Cervical myelopathy as a complication of rheumatoid arthritis].

Authors:  A C Arlt; J Steinmetz
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.372

10.  Does the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine have an impact on disk degeneration? Minimum 10-year follow-up of asymptomatic volunteers.

Authors:  Eijiro Okada; Morio Matsumoto; Daisuke Ichihara; Kazuhiro Chiba; Yoshiaki Toyama; Hirokazu Fujiwara; Suketaka Momoshima; Yuji Nishiwaki; Takeshi Hashimoto; Jun Ogawa; Masahiko Watanabe; Takeshi Takahata
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.