Literature DB >> 12810038

A sexual selection theory longitudinal analysis of sexual segregation and integration in early adolescence.

Anthony D Pellegrini1, Jeffrey D Long.   

Abstract

The three objectives in this longitudinal study were motivated by sexual selection theory. The theory specifies the role of sexually segregated groups and the effects of dominance in male groups and relational/indirect aggression in female groups for heterosexual relationships. Using a multi-method, multi-informant, longitudinal design we studied youngsters (N=138) across their first two years of middle school. First, we examined the nature of change in segregation and dating popularity across two years during early adolescence. Second, a model derived from sexual selection theory is tested to explain the ways in which boys and girls are nominated for hypothetical dates (dating popularity). Third, we examined the role of "poke and push courtship" behavior in boys' and girls' dating popularity. Results indicate that although groups did not become more integrated with time, changes in peer group sexual integration co-varied dynamically with dating popularity. Secondly, dominance-related strategies were more important for boys than girls in dating popularity whereas indirect, or relational, aggression strategies were more important for girls than boys. Third, "poke and push courtship" behaviors did not influence peer group integration or dating.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12810038     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0965(03)00060-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol        ISSN: 0022-0965


  14 in total

1.  An ecological analysis of the effects of deviant peer clustering on sexual promiscuity, problem behavior, and childbearing from early adolescence to adulthood: an enhancement of the life history framework.

Authors:  Thomas J Dishion; Thao Ha; Marie-Hélène Véronneau
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2012-03-12

2.  Popularity among same-sex and cross-sex peers: a process-oriented examination of links to aggressive behaviors and depressive affect.

Authors:  Wendy Troop-Gordon; John D Ranney
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2014-03-31

3.  Nice Guys and Gals Finish Last? Not in Early Adolescence When Empathic, Accepted, and Popular Peers are Desirable.

Authors:  Andrew R Bower; Adrienne Nishina; Melissa R Witkow; Amy Bellmore
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2015-08-28

4.  A Social Neuroscience Perspective on Adolescent Risk-Taking.

Authors:  Laurence Steinberg
Journal:  Dev Rev       Date:  2008-03

5.  Romantic partner selection and socialization of young adolescents' substance use and behavior problems.

Authors:  Julie Wargo Aikins; Valerie A Simon; Mitchell J Prinstein
Journal:  J Adolesc       Date:  2010-12

6.  Childhood peer reputation as a predictor of competence and symptoms 10 years later.

Authors:  Scott D Gest; Arturo Sesma; Ann S Masten; Auke Tellegen
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2006-08

7.  Social Network Centrality and Leadership Status: Links with Problem Behaviors and Tests of Gender Differences.

Authors:  Jennifer E Lansford; Philip R Costanzo; Christina Grimes; Martha Putallaz; Shari Miller; Patrick S Malone
Journal:  Merrill Palmer Q (Wayne State Univ Press)       Date:  2009-01-01

8.  Peer status and aggression as predictors of dating popularity in adolescence.

Authors:  John J Houser; Lara Mayeux; Cassandra Cross
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2014-08-29

9.  Romantic partner selection and socialization during early adolescence.

Authors:  Valerie A Simon; Julie Wargo Aikins; Mitchell J Prinstein
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec

Review 10.  Do human females use indirect aggression as an intrasexual competition strategy?

Authors:  Tracy Vaillancourt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.