Literature DB >> 12809891

5-year outcome of a prospective randomized trial to compare transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate and standard transurethral resection.

Mohamed Y Hammadeh1, Sanjeev Madaan, John Hines, Timothy Philp.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To update our prospective randomized trial comparing the safety, efficacy, and durability of transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate (TUVP) using the VaporTrode with standard transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).
METHODS: A total of 104 patients, taken from the waiting list for surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia were randomized to TUVP (52 patients, mean age 67.5 years) or TURP (52 patients, mean age 70.2 years). In each group, 51, 47, and 40 patients completed 1, 2, and 3 years of follow-up, respectively. Of the 104 patients, 27 TURP and 26 TUVP patients completed 5 years of follow-up.
RESULTS: Both groups were comparable in terms of the mean preoperative International Prostate Symptom Score, quality-of-life score, maximal urinary flow rate, and postvoid residual volume. The follow-up data at 5 years showed a significant and maintained improvement in the mean International Prostate Symptom Score (TUVP: 5.9 +/- 6.3 versus TURP: 8.6 +/- 7.1, P = 0.16), quality-of-life score (TUVP: 1.1 +/- 1.2 versus TURP: 1.7 +/- 1.4, P = 0.09), and mean maximal urinary flow rate (TUVP: 21 +/- 9 mL/s versus TURP: 17.9 +/- 13.1 mL/s, P = 0.17), with decreases in the mean postvoid residual volume (TUVP: 27.3 +/- 44.3 mL versus TURP: 10.7 +/- 13.1 mL, P = 0.08). Two patients in each group (4%) developed urethral strictures. Two TURP patients (4%) developed bladder neck strictures compared with one TUVP patient (2%). In each arm, 7 patients (13%) underwent reoperation during a 5-year period (approximate reoperation rate: 3% in each arm per year). Postoperatively and during 3 years of follow-up, impotence was reported in 17% of the TUVP group and 11% of the TURP group (P = 0.49); retrograde ejaculation was reported in 72% of the TUVP group and 89% of the TURP group (P = 0.47).
CONCLUSIONS: Our 5-year follow-up results confirm that TUVP is as effective as standard TURP in the treatment of moderate-size benign prostatic hyperplasia. The reoperation rate and long-term complication rate are comparable and the initial improvement has been maintained during a 5-year period for most patients in both groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12809891     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(03)00109-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  19 in total

1.  [Therapy of benign prostate syndrome (BPS): guidelines of the German Urologists (DGU)].

Authors:  R Berges; K Dreikorn; K Höfner; S Madersbacher; M C Michel; R Muschter; M Oelke; O Reich; W Rulf; C Tschuschke; U Tunn
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms related to uncomplicated benign prostatic hyperplasia in Italy: updated summary from AURO.it.

Authors:  Sebastiano Spatafora; Antonio Casarico; Andrea Fandella; Caterina Galetti; Rodolfo Hurle; Elisa Mazzini; Ciro Niro; Massimo Perachino; Roberto Sanseverino; Giovanni Luigi Pappagallo
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2012-12

Review 3.  Long-term results of surgical techniques and procedures in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Charles Metcalfe; Kenneth S Poon
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  [Long-term results after prostate vaporisation : GreenLight™ laser vaporisation of the prostate and electrovaporisation].

Authors:  M Rieken; A Bachmann; S F Shariat
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  [Surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia-resection, vaporization or enucleation?]

Authors:  M Rieken; T R W Herrmann; C Füllhase
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  [Benign prostatic syndrome (BPS). Ablative treatments].

Authors:  O Reich; M Seitz; C Gratzke; B Schlenker; A Bachmann; C Stief
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Five-Year Follow-Up Study of Transurethral Plasmakinetic Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Authors:  Yangyang Hu; Xuecheng Dong; Guangchun Wang; Jianhua Huang; Min Liu; Bo Peng
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Warm sitz bath: are there benefits after transurethral resection of the prostate?

Authors:  Sang Un Park; Seung Hwan Lee; Yeun Goo Chung; Kyung Kgi Park; Sang Yol Mah; Sung Joon Hong; Byung Ha Chung
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-11-17

9.  Energy delivery systems for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2006-08-01

10.  Transurethral resection of the prostate in Northern Nigeria, problems and prospects.

Authors:  S U Alhasan; S A Aji; A Z Mohammed; S Malami
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 2.264

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.