Literature DB >> 12809434

Scientific foundations of hormesis. Part 2. Maturation, strengths, limitations, and possible applications in toxicology, pharmacology, and epidemiology.

Karl K Rozman1, John Doull.   

Abstract

The notion of hormesis has undergone numerous modifications in the course of the 20th century. Because of its unfortunate association with homeopathy, hormesis did not gain acceptance among biomedical professionals. The lack of a plausible mechanism for its occurrence may have contributed much to the rejection of this concept. This treatise outlines the conceptual struggle for an understanding of the widespread occurrence of low dose effects that appear to be opposite to those caused by high doses as also seen in hormesis. An incomplete conceptualization of time as a fundamental variable of effects (in addition to dose) is identified as one of the major reasons why hermetic responses were not observed more frequently than was reported by Calabrese and Baldwin. The definition of hormesis as an (over)compensation response to an inhibitory signal lacks a designation for (over)compensation responses to stimulatory signals in the other direction. Hormoligosis, which was coined by Luckey for all low-dose stimulatory responses of toxins, is suggested as a suitable term for generalizing the latter types of effects. Both types of effects are recognized as originating in a homeostatic overcompensation response that optimizes the ability of an organism to meet challenges beyond the limits of normal (unexercised) adaptation. Thus, repeated biochemical/physiologic/immunological, etc. exercises like physical exercise make an organism more fit and hence both hormetic and hormoligotic effects will have life-prolonging consequences. A more complete generalization was developed by linking hormesis/hormoligosis with the vast literature on Selye's general adaptation syndrome to stress. According to this broader view, stress is just one type of homeostatic exercise making organisms more fit for future biochemical/physiological/immunological, etc.challenges. Therefore, both hormesis and hormoligosis are manifestations of two nonmutational evolutionary principles--homeostasis and optimization.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12809434     DOI: 10.1080/713611037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol        ISSN: 1040-8444            Impact factor:   5.635


  4 in total

1.  Insects, insecticides and hormesis: evidence and considerations for study.

Authors:  G Christopher Cutler
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  A model for homeopathic remedy effects: low dose nanoparticles, allostatic cross-adaptation, and time-dependent sensitization in a complex adaptive system.

Authors:  Iris R Bell; Mary Koithan
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 3.659

3.  Immunology and homeopathy. 2. Cells of the immune system and inflammation.

Authors:  Paolo Bellavite; Anita Conforti; Francesco Pontarollo; Riccardo Ortolani
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2006-02-05       Impact factor: 2.629

4.  Immunology and homeopathy. 5. The rationale of the 'Simile'.

Authors:  Paolo Bellavite; Riccardo Ortolani; Francesco Pontarollo; Giuseppina Pitari; Anita Conforti
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2007-02-05       Impact factor: 2.629

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.