Literature DB >> 12808626

Limits and drawbacks of video-assisted parathyroidectomy.

P Berti1, G Materazzi, A Picone, P Miccoli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy (MIVAP) is a novel minimally invasive approach to primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). It is a gasless operation characterized by a single central incision and external retraction. This paper describes the drawbacks and limitations of this procedure based on a 5-year experience and 260 operations.
METHODS: Of 364 patients with PHTP, 260 were selected for MIVAP. In most patients a unilateral minimally invasive exploration was performed.
RESULTS: MIVAP was carried out successfully in 239 patients with a mean operating time of 40 (range 20-180) min. Conversion to cervicotomy was required in 21 patients (8.1 per cent). Complications included recurrent nerve palsy in two patients (0.8 per cent), haemorrhage that required reoperation 6 h after parathyroidectomy in one patient (0.4 per cent) and transient hypoparathyroidism in six patients (2.5 per cent). In five patients (2.1 per cent) persistent PHPT developed shortly after surgery.
CONCLUSION: After 5 years of experience, MIVAP appears to be feasible, safe and applicable to the majority of patients with PHPT. Copyright 2003 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12808626     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  12 in total

1.  Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy.

Authors:  F Fausto Palazzo; Gregory P Sadler
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-04-10

2.  Parathyroid surgery: we only need a minimal surgical approach.

Authors:  P Miccoli
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.256

3.  Video-assisted bilateral neck exploration in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism and failed localization studies.

Authors:  Pier F Alesina; Reyaz M Singaporewalla; Martin K Walz
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Less is more: time to expand the indications for minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy.

Authors:  S Bakkar; V Matteucci; C Corsini; S Pagliaro; P Miccoli
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 4.256

5.  Results of video-assisted parathyroidectomy: single institution's six-year experience.

Authors:  Paolo Miccoli; Piero Berti; Gabriele Materazzi; Marco Massi; Antonella Picone; Michele N Minuto
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2004-11-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Video-assisted minimally invasive parathyroidectomy: benefits and long-term results.

Authors:  Celestino P Lombardi; Marco Raffaelli; Emanuela Traini; Carmela De Crea; Salvatore M Corsello; Rocco Bellantone
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy versus open minimally invasive parathyroidectomy for a solitary parathyroid adenoma: a prospective, randomized, blinded trial.

Authors:  Marcin Barczyński; Stanisław Cichoń; Aleksander Konturek; Wojciech Cichoń
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Transoral parathyroid surgery--a new alternative or nonsense?

Authors:  Elias Karakas; Thorsten Steinfeldt; Andreas Gockel; Anton Mangalo; Andreas Sesterhenn; Detlef K Bartsch
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy. Initial experience in a General Surgery Department.

Authors:  C Dobrinja; G Trevisan; G Liguori
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.256

10.  Transoral thyroid and parathyroid surgery.

Authors:  Elias Karakas; Thorsten Steinfeldt; Andreas Gockel; Reiner Westermann; Anja Kiefer; Detlef K Bartsch
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.