L H Eadie1, A M Seifalian, B R Davidson. 1. University Department of Surgery, Royal Free and University College School of Medicine, University College London and Royal Free Hospital NHS Trust, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Telemedicine is influencing surgical training, allows mentoring, proctoring and teleconferencing, and is increasingly being applied to carry out remote surgical procedures. A systematic review of the telemedicine systems available, along with a critical appraisal of their application, potential and limitations in the surgical field, has been undertaken. METHOD: Medline, Ovid and internet searches were carried out using the keywords 'telesurgery', 'telepresence surgery' and 'telemedicine and surgery', along with hand searches of the two peer-reviewed telesurgery journals. RESULTS: Telementoring and teleconferencing have been used widely for surgical teaching and training. Two clinical telesurgery systems are currently available and have been a trial in patients undergoing a variety of operations including cholecystectomy, coronary artery bypass, prostatectomy and gastroplasty. Most studies have reported successful outcomes but with prolonged operating times. In 2002 the first long-distance telesurgery procedure was successfully performed. CONCLUSION: Telemedicine has huge potential to alter surgical practice but improvements are required in telesurgical technology with respect to tactile feedback, instrumentation, telecommunication speed and availability. Issues of liability, legislation, cost and benefit require clarification. The future of telemedicine in surgery may lie in facilitating complex minimally invasive techniques. Copyright 2003 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
BACKGROUND: Telemedicine is influencing surgical training, allows mentoring, proctoring and teleconferencing, and is increasingly being applied to carry out remote surgical procedures. A systematic review of the telemedicine systems available, along with a critical appraisal of their application, potential and limitations in the surgical field, has been undertaken. METHOD: Medline, Ovid and internet searches were carried out using the keywords 'telesurgery', 'telepresence surgery' and 'telemedicine and surgery', along with hand searches of the two peer-reviewed telesurgery journals. RESULTS: Telementoring and teleconferencing have been used widely for surgical teaching and training. Two clinical telesurgery systems are currently available and have been a trial in patients undergoing a variety of operations including cholecystectomy, coronary artery bypass, prostatectomy and gastroplasty. Most studies have reported successful outcomes but with prolonged operating times. In 2002 the first long-distance telesurgery procedure was successfully performed. CONCLUSION: Telemedicine has huge potential to alter surgical practice but improvements are required in telesurgical technology with respect to tactile feedback, instrumentation, telecommunication speed and availability. Issues of liability, legislation, cost and benefit require clarification. The future of telemedicine in surgery may lie in facilitating complex minimally invasive techniques. Copyright 2003 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors: Stavros A Antoniou; George A Antoniou; Jan Franzen; Stefan Bollmann; Oliver O Koch; Rudolf Pointner; Frank A Granderath Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2012-02-15 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Willem I M Willaert; Rajesh Aggarwal; Isabelle Van Herzeele; Nicholas J Cheshire; Frank E Vermassen Journal: World J Surg Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: P V Pradeep; Anjali Mishra; B N Mohanty; K C Mohapatra; Gaurav Agarwal; Saroj Kanta Mishra Journal: World J Surg Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Allan Okrainec; Melina Vassiliou; Andrew Kapoor; Kristen Pitzul; Oscar Henao; Pepa Kaneva; Timothy Jackson; E Matt Ritter Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2013-09-10 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Gary A Vercruysse; Hasan B Alam; Matthew J Martin; Karen Brasel; Eugene E Moore; Carlos V Brown; Amanda Bettencourt; John Schulz; Tina Palmieri; Linwood Haith; Kenji Inaba Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 3.313