Literature DB >> 12808582

What random assignment does and does not do.

Merton S Krause1, Kenneth I Howard.   

Abstract

Random assignment of patients to comparison groups stochastically tends, with increasing sample size or number of experiment replications, to minimize the confounding of treatment outcome differences by the effects of differences among these groups in unknown/unmeasured patient characteristics. To what degree such confounding is actually avoided we cannot know unless we have validly measured these patient variables, but completely avoiding it is quite unlikely. Even if this confounding were completely avoided, confounding by unmeasured Patient Variable x Treatment Variable interactions remains a possibility. And the causal power of the confounding variables is no less important for internal validity than the degree of confounding. Copyright 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Psychol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12808582     DOI: 10.1002/jclp.10170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9762


  5 in total

1.  Is personality a key predictor of missing study data? An analysis from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anthony Jerant; Benjamin P Chapman; Paul Duberstein; Peter Franks
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  Impact of referral source and study applicants' preference for randomly assigned service on research enrollment, service engagement, and evaluative outcomes.

Authors:  Cathaleene Macias; Paul Barreira; William Hargreaves; Leonard Bickman; William Fisher; Elliot Aronson
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 18.112

3.  Preference in random assignment: implications for the interpretation of randomized trials.

Authors:  Cathaleene Macias; Paul B Gold; William A Hargreaves; Elliot Aronson; Leonard Bickman; Paul J Barreira; Danson R Jones; Charles F Rodican; William H Fisher
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2009-05-12

4.  When programs benefit some people more than others: tests of differential service effectiveness.

Authors:  Cathaleene Macias; Danson R Jones; William A Hargreaves; Qi Wang; Charles F Rodican; Paul J Barreira; Paul B Gold
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2008-07

5.  Patient Expectations of Assigned Treatments Impact Strength of Randomised Control Trials.

Authors:  Roberto Truzoli; Phil Reed; Lisa A Osborne
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-06-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.