Literature DB >> 12808550

Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects.

Stefan Hesse1, Gotthard Schulte-Tigges, Matthias Konrad, Anita Bardeleben, Cordula Werner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether use of a robotic arm trainer for bilateral exercise in daily repetitive training for a 3-week period reduced spasticity and improved motor control in the arm of severely affected, chronic hemiparetic subjects.
DESIGN: Before-after trial.
SETTING: Community rehabilitation center in Germany. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive sample of 12 chronic hemiparetic patients; minimum stroke interval 6 months; patients could maximally protract the affected shoulder, hold the extended arm, or slightly flex and extend the elbow.
INTERVENTIONS: Additional daily therapy of 15 minutes with the arm trainer for 3 weeks; the 1 degree of freedom trainer enabled the bilateral passive and active practice of a forearm pronation and supination and wrist dorsiflexion and volarflexion; impedance control guaranteed a smooth movement. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients' impressions, the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score (range, 0-5) to assess spasticity, and the arm section of the Rivermead Motor Assessment (RMA) score (range, 0-15) to assess motor control were rated before therapy, after each 3-week interval, and at follow-up 3 months later.
RESULTS: All patients had favorable impressions: the extremity felt more vivid, and 8 subjects noticed a reduction in spasticity, an ease of hand hygiene, and pain relief. The MAS score of the wrist and fingers joints decreased significantly (P<.0125) from a median of 3 (2-3) and 3 (3-4) to 2 (1-2) and 2.5 (2-3). The RMA score minimally increased in 5 cases without improvement in functional tasks. The median RMA score before therapy was 2.0 (1-2) and 2.0 (1-3.75) after therapy. There were no side effects. At follow-up, the effects had waned.
CONCLUSIONS: The arm trainer made possible intensive bilateral elbow and wrist training of severely affected stroke patients. Future studies should address the treatment effect in subacute stroke patients and determine the optimum treatment intensity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12808550     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(02)04954-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  71 in total

Review 1.  Strategies for stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Bruce H Dobkin
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 44.182

Review 2.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper extremities.

Authors:  R Riener; T Nef; G Colombo
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation: a robot for wrist rehabilitation.

Authors:  Hermano Igo Krebs; Bruce T Volpe; Dustin Williams; James Celestino; Steven K Charles; Daniel Lynch; Neville Hogan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  Improving hand function in stroke survivors: a pilot study of contralaterally controlled functional electric stimulation in chronic hemiplegia.

Authors:  Jayme S Knutson; Mary Y Harley; Terri Z Hisel; John Chae
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  A Semi-passive Planar Manipulandum for Upper-Extremity Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Chih-Kang Chang; Edward P Washabaugh; Andrew Gwozdziowski; C David Remy; Chandramouli Krishnan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Early detection of hand movements from electroencephalograms for stroke therapy applications.

Authors:  A Muralidharan; J Chae; D M Taylor
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 7.  Poststroke motor dysfunction and spasticity: novel pharmacological and physical treatment strategies.

Authors:  Stefan Hesse; Cordula Werner
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 8.  Technology-assisted training of arm-hand skills in stroke: concepts on reacquisition of motor control and therapist guidelines for rehabilitation technology design.

Authors:  Annick A A Timmermans; Henk A M Seelen; Richard D Willmann; Herman Kingma
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 9.  Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury.

Authors:  Laura Marchal-Crespo; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Effects of intensive arm training with the rehabilitation robot ARMin II in chronic stroke patients: four single-cases.

Authors:  Patricia Staubli; Tobias Nef; Verena Klamroth-Marganska; Robert Riener
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.